Paper · 2000 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Mode of Action of Hot-Water Dip in Reducing Decay of Lemon Fruit

Beatrice Nafussi; Shimshon Ben-Yehoshua; Victor Rodov; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
82
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A hot-water dip for 2 min at 52-53 degrees C prevented decay for at least one week in lemon fruit inoculated with Penicillium digitatum. The mode of action of hot water in reducing decay was investigated by studying the effects of this treatment on the pathogen and on the resistance mechanisms of the fruit. The hot-water dip had a transient inhibitory effect on the pathogen, arresting its growth for 24-48 h. During this lag period, the combined effects of the pathogen and the hot-water dip induced the build up of resistance in the peel. Lignin production in the inoculated sites began within 24 h after inoculation or wounding. When inoculation was followed by the hot-water dip, lignin accumulation continued for a week. Inoculated lemons that were not dipped in hot water rotted completely within 3 days after inoculation and their lignin content did not rise or even decreased. The scoparone concentration in the inoculated sites of hot dipped fruit started to rise 24 h after treatment and reached a level sufficient to inhibit the pathogen within 2 days after treatment. Parallel to scoparone accumulation, scopoletin was detected in inoculated and heat-treated lemons. Without the pathogen challenge or wounding, heat treatment by itself was not able to induce any of the above-mentioned defensive effects. Our data do not support the involvement of ethanol-extractable aldehydes, associated in the literature with wound gum, or of citral in decay inhibition in hot-water dipped lemons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A hot-water dip prevented decay for at least one week in lemon fruit inoculated with Penicillium digitatum.

Taxon
lemon fruitCitrus ×limone0
Treatment
A hot-water dip for 2 min at 52-53 degrees Ce0
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
preventede0
Value
at least one weeke0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A hot-water dip for 2 min at 52-53 degrees C prevented decay for at least one week in lemon fruit inoculated with Penicillium digitatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hot-water dip temporarily arrested pathogen growth for 24-48 h.

Taxon
Lemon FruitCitrus ×limont0
Treatment
The hot-water dipe0
Outcome
the pathogen, arresting its growthe0
Direction
arrestinge0
Value
24-48 he0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hot-water dip had a transient inhibitory effect on the pathogen, arresting its growth for 24-48 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lemon Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen challenge combined with the dip induced resistance in lemon peel during the lag period.

Taxon
Lemon FruitCitrus ×limont0
Organ / stage
peele0
Treatment
hot-water dipe0
Outcome
build up of resistance in the peele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During this lag period, the combined effects of the pathogen and the hot-water dip induced the build up of resistance in the peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lemon Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lignin production began within 24 h at inoculated or wounded sites.

Taxon
Lemon FruitCitrus ×limont0
Organ / stage
inoculated sitese0
Outcome
Lignin productione0
Value
within 24 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lignin production in the inoculated sites began within 24 h after inoculation or wounding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lemon Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After inoculation and hot-water dipping, lignin accumulation continued for a week.

Taxon
Lemon FruitCitrus ×limont0
Treatment
hot-water dipe0
Outcome
lignin accumulatione0
Direction
continuede0
Value
for a weeke0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When inoculation was followed by the hot-water dip, lignin accumulation continued for a week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lemon Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated lemons without hot-water dipping rotted completely within three days.

Taxon
lemonsCitrus ×limone0
Treatment
not dipped in hot watere0
Outcome
rotted completelye0
Value
within 3 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated lemons that were not dipped in hot water rotted completely within 3 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–829 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lignin content did not rise or decreased in inoculated lemons without a dip.

Taxon
Lemon FruitCitrus ×limont0
Outcome
lignin contente0
Direction
did not rise or even decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their lignin content did not rise or even decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lemon Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scoparone concentration rose at inoculated sites of dipped fruit after 24 h.

Taxon
Lemon FruitCitrus ×limont0
Organ / stage
inoculated sitese0
Outcome
scoparone concentratione0
Direction
risee0
Value
24 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The scoparone concentration in the inoculated sites of hot dipped fruit started to rise 24 h after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lemon Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scoparone reached a pathogen-inhibitory level within two days of treatment.

Taxon
Lemon FruitCitrus ×limont0
Outcome
a level sufficient to inhibit the pathogene0
Direction
reachede0
Value
within 2 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reached a level sufficient to inhibit the pathogen within 2 days after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lemon Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scopoletin was detected in inoculated and heat-treated lemons.

Taxon
lemonsCitrus ×limone0
Treatment
heat-treatede0
Outcome
scopoletin was detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“scopoletin was detected in inoculated and heat-treated lemons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatment alone did not induce the defensive effects without challenge or wounding.

Taxon
Lemon FruitCitrus ×limont0
Treatment
heat treatmente0
Outcome
defensive effectse0
Direction
not able to inducee0
Qualifier
Without the pathogen challenge or woundinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without the pathogen challenge or wounding, heat treatment by itself was not able to induce any of the above-mentioned defensive effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lemon Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The data did not support ethanol-extractable aldehydes as contributors to decay inhibition.

Taxon
lemonsCitrus ×limone0
Compound
ethanol-extractable aldehydese0
Outcome
decay inhibitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our data do not support the involvement of ethanol-extractable aldehydes, associated in the literature with wound gum, or of citral in decay inhibition in hot-water dipped lemons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1497 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The data did not support citral as a contributor to decay inhibition.

Taxon
lemonsCitrus ×limone0
Compound
citrale0
Outcome
decay inhibitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“or of citral in decay inhibition in hot-water dipped lemons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1497 · show in text ↑

heat · molecular: metabolites · Citrus x limon (lemon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.