Paper · 1985 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

EFFECT OF HARVEST TIME AND DRYING METHOD ON YIELD, QUALITY AND GRADE CHARACTERISTICS OF BARLEY IN NORTHWEST ALBERTA

J. V. CHRISTENSEN; W. G. LEGGE

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments with three barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Olli, Bonanza and Klages, were conducted for 3 yr at Beaverlodge, Alberta to determine the effect of harvest time and drying method on yield and quality. Plots were harvested at 5% kernel moisture content (KMC) intervals in the range of 45–15% and dried in the windrow or artificially dried. Yield, test weight, 1000-kernel weight, germination percent, protein content, phosphorous content and commercial grade were determined. Protein and phosphorous content were unaffected by the treatments. Windrowing at 40% KMC or less had little effect on yield or quality characteristics while threshing and artificially drying barley above 20% KMC reduced test weight and germination. Windrowing reduced yields of Olli and Klages barley by up to 19% compared to direct combining. Most treatments received feed grades, but the crop was most likely to meet Canada Western grades when windrowed at 30% KMC or less under favourable harvest conditions.Key words: Hordeum vulgare L., kernel moisture content, yield, quality

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein and phosphorus content were unaffected by the harvest and drying treatments.

Treatment
dried in the windrow or artificially driede1
Outcome
Protein and phosphorous contente2
Direction
unaffectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“BARLEY IN NORTHWEST ALBERTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“dried in the windrow or artificially dried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–358 · show in text ↑
e2

“Protein and phosphorous content were unaffected by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Windrowing at 40% KMC or less had little effect on yield or quality characteristics.

Treatment
Windrowing at 40% KMC or lesse3
Outcome
yield or quality characteristicse3
Direction
little effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“BARLEY IN NORTHWEST ALBERTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“Windrowing at 40% KMC or less had little effect on yield or quality characteristics while threshing and artificially drying barley above 20% KMC reduced test weight and germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Threshing and artificially drying barley above 20% KMC reduced test weight and germination.

Treatment
threshing and artificially dryinge4
Outcome
test weight and germinatione4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“BARLEY IN NORTHWEST ALBERTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“threshing and artificially drying barley above 20% KMC reduced test weight and germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Windrowing reduced yields of Olli and Klages barley by up to 19% compared with direct combining.

Material
Olli and Klagese5
Treatment
Windrowinge5
Outcome
yieldse5
Direction
reducede5
Value
19%e5
Qualifier
by up toe5
Comparator
direct combininge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“BARLEY IN NORTHWEST ALBERTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“Windrowing reduced yields of Olli and Klages barley by up to 19% compared to direct combining”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley was most likely to meet Canada Western grades when windrowed at 30% KMC or less under favourable harvest conditions.

Treatment
windrowed at 30% KMC or lesse6
Outcome
meet Canada Western gradese6
Direction
most likelye6
Qualifier
under favourable harvest conditionse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“BARLEY IN NORTHWEST ALBERTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“the crop was most likely to meet Canada Western grades when windrowed at 30% KMC or less under favourable harvest conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1006 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most barley treatments received feed grades.

Outcome
feed gradese7
Qualifier
Most treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“BARLEY IN NORTHWEST ALBERTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–115 · show in text ↑
e7

“Most treatments received feed grades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–876 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

processing · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

wind · quality: general · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.