Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ball milling improved digestibility more than delignification, irrespective of the digestion system.

A claim from The effect of physical and chemical treatments on the degradation of wheat and barley straws by rumen liquor‐pepsin and pepsin‐cellulase systems · 1983

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ball milling improved digestibility more than delignification, irrespective of the digestion system.

Treatment
ball millinge2
Outcome
digestibilitye2
Direction
improvede2
Qualifier
irrespective of the digestion systeme2
Comparator
delignificatione2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples of wheat and barley straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–42
e2

“ball milling improved the digestibility more than delignification, irrespective of the digestion system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–719

Title

The effect of physical and chemical treatments on the degradation of wheat and barley straws by rumen liquor‐pepsin and pepsin‐cellulase systems

Ian M. Morrison Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1983. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740341203

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9effdfb2ec7904d984dbf119a5af33c16528dda2a8361734da20a9b7f8e708b1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

processing · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.