Paper · 1983 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

The effect of physical and chemical treatments on the degradation of wheat and barley straws by rumen liquor‐pepsin and pepsin‐cellulase systems

Ian M. Morrison

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
35
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Samples of wheat and barley straw, milled through a 1 mm sieve, were ball milled to <0.25 mm as a representative physical treatment, or delignified by the acidchlorite procedure as a representative chemical treatment. The original and treated samples were examined using in‐vitro digestion systems based on rumen liquor‐pepsin and pepsin‐cellulase. The digestibility was determined as well as the extent of digestion of the cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. The rumen liquor‐pepsin system was able to digest a greater proportion of the original and treated straws than the pepsin‐cellulase system while ball milling improved the digestibility more than delignification, irrespective of the digestion system. Core lignin was not digested by either system. Ball milling improved the digestibility of the cellulose fraction to a greater extent than the hemicellulose fraction, whereas delignification had a greater effect on hemicellulose digestion than on cellulose digestion. There were also differences in the rate of removal of the different sugar residues present in the hemicellulose fraction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rumen liquor‐pepsin system digested a greater proportion of wheat and barley straws than the pepsin‐cellulase system.

Treatment
rumen liquor‐pepsin systeme1
Outcome
a greater proportion of the original and treated strawse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
pepsin‐cellulase systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples of wheat and barley straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rumen liquor‐pepsin system was able to digest a greater proportion of the original and treated straws than the pepsin‐cellulase system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ball milling improved digestibility more than delignification, irrespective of the digestion system.

Treatment
ball millinge2
Outcome
digestibilitye2
Direction
improvede2
Qualifier
irrespective of the digestion systeme2
Comparator
delignificatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples of wheat and barley straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“ball milling improved the digestibility more than delignification, irrespective of the digestion system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Core lignin was not digested by either digestion system.

Outcome
Core lignine3
Qualifier
not digested by either systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples of wheat and barley straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“Core lignin was not digested by either system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ball milling improved digestibility of the cellulose fraction to a greater extent than that of the hemicellulose fraction.

Treatment
ball millinge4
Outcome
digestibility of the cellulose fractione4
Direction
to a greater extente4
Comparator
hemicellulose fractione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples of wheat and barley straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–42 · show in text ↑
e4

“Ball milling improved the digestibility of the cellulose fraction to a greater extent than the hemicellulose fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delignification had a greater effect on hemicellulose digestion than on cellulose digestion.

Treatment
delignificatione5
Outcome
hemicellulose digestione5
Direction
greater effecte5
Comparator
cellulose digestione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples of wheat and barley straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–42 · show in text ↑
e5

“delignification had a greater effect on hemicellulose digestion than on cellulose digestion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–986 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of removal of the different sugar residues in the hemicellulose fraction differed.

Outcome
rate of removal of the different sugar residuese6
Qualifier
present in the hemicellulose fractione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samples of wheat and barley straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–42 · show in text ↑
e6

“There were also differences in the rate of removal of the different sugar residues present in the hemicellulose fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1108 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.