Paper · 1983 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Rhizobium strain evaluation of Glycine max cv. Davis, Vigna mungo cv. Regur and V. unguiculata cv. Caloona for three soils in glasshouse and field experiments

HVA Bushby; RA Date; KL Butler

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The need for inoculation of soybean (Glycine max cv. Davis), gram (Vigna mungo cv. Regur) and cowpea (V. unguiculata cv. Caloona) with six appropriate strains of Rhizobium in two grain legume, clay soil growing areas (Narayen and Emerald, central Queensland) and a Rhizobium free (to sparse) soil (Beerwah, in south-eastern Queensland) was investigated in glasshouse and field experiments. Inoculated plants generally had vegetative and grain yields which were between those of the nitrogen and nil nitrogen uninoculated controls, although for the freely nodulating Vigna species the nil nitrogen control plants were sometimes as large as those in the inoculated treatments. The strains of Rhizobium CB1015 and CB1243 performed well on cowpea and gram as did most strains used as inoculum on soybean. Strain USDA94 was often poor on soybean. In the two heavy clay soils tested, plants inoculated with CB756 and the streptomycin-resistant mutant CB756str developed nitrogen deficiency symptoms in their leaves, suggesting that the strains were not suited to those soil types. There was not a close relationship between the glasshouse and field means due to large residual errors in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated legumes generally had vegetative and grain yields between nitrogen-supplied and nil-nitrogen uninoculated controls.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Inoculated plantse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
vegetative and grain yieldse0
Direction
betweene0
Comparator
nitrogen and nil nitrogen uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants generally had vegetative and grain yields which were between those of the nitrogen and nil nitrogen uninoculated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–529 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean (Glycine max cv. Davis), gram (Vigna mungo cv. Regur) and cowpea (V. unguiculata cv. Caloona) with six appropriate strains of Rhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nil-nitrogen Vigna controls were sometimes as large as inoculated plants.

Taxon
Vigna speciesVignae0
Treatment
inoculated treatmentse0
Outcome
as largee0
Direction
as largee0
Comparator
nil nitrogen control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna
Vigna · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Harry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the freely nodulating Vigna species the nil nitrogen control plants were sometimes as large as those in the inoculated treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium CB1015 performed well on cowpea.

Treatment
Rhizobium CB1015e0
Interactor
Rhizobium CB1015e0symbiont
Outcome
performed welle0
Direction
performed welle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strains of Rhizobium CB1015 and CB1243 performed well on cowpea and gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium CB1243 performed well on cowpea.

Treatment
CB1243e0
Interactor
CB1243e0symbiont
Outcome
performed welle0
Direction
performed welle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strains of Rhizobium CB1015 and CB1243 performed well on cowpea and gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium CB1015 performed well on gram.

Taxon
grame0
Treatment
Rhizobium CB1015e0
Interactor
Rhizobium CB1015e0symbiont
Outcome
performed welle0
Direction
performed welle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The strains of Rhizobium CB1015 and CB1243 performed well on cowpea and gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium CB1243 performed well on gram.

Taxon
grame0
Treatment
CB1243e0
Interactor
CB1243e0symbiont
Outcome
performed welle0
Direction
performed welle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The strains of Rhizobium CB1015 and CB1243 performed well on cowpea and gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most Rhizobium strains performed well on soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
most strains used as inoculume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
performed welle1
Direction
performed welle1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most strains used as inoculum on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“The strains of Rhizobium CB1015 and CB1243 performed well on cowpea and gram as did most strains used as inoculum on soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USDA94 often performed poorly on soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Strain USDA94e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt0symbiont
Outcome
poore0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain USDA94 was often poor on soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium strain evaluation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CB756 caused leaf nitrogen-deficiency symptoms in heavy clay soils.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxt0
Treatment
inoculated with CB756e0
Interactor
CB756e0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen deficiency symptomse0
Setting
two heavy clay soilse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the two heavy clay soils tested, plants inoculated with CB756 and the streptomycin-resistant mutant CB756str developed nitrogen deficiency symptoms in their leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium strain evaluation of Glycine max cv. Davis, Vigna mungo cv. Regur and V. unguiculata cv. Caloona”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CB756str caused leaf nitrogen-deficiency symptoms in heavy clay soils.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxt0
Treatment
streptomycin-resistant mutant CB756stre0
Interactor
CB756stre0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen deficiency symptomse0
Setting
two heavy clay soilse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the two heavy clay soils tested, plants inoculated with CB756 and the streptomycin-resistant mutant CB756str developed nitrogen deficiency symptoms in their leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizobium strain evaluation of Glycine max cv. Davis, Vigna mungo cv. Regur and V. unguiculata cv. Caloona”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glasshouse and field means were not closely related because of large field residual errors.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxt0
Outcome
relationship between the glasshouse and field meanse0
Direction
not a closee0
Setting
glasshouse and fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was not a close relationship between the glasshouse and field means due to large residual errors in the field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glycine max cv. Davis, Vigna mungo cv. Regur and V. unguiculata cv. Caloona”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–106 · show in text ↑

loss of function · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 17 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 43 positive, 3 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

inoculation · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 60 positive, 67 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.