Paper · 2012 · Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture -Isfahan University of Technology

RESPONSE OF CUT ROSE FLOWER (ROSA HYBRIDA) TO BIOFERTILIZER APPLICATION IN HYDROPONIC SYSTEM

Nurnaeimah Nik; H R Zabihi; Ahmad Asgharzadeh

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rose flower (Rosa hybrida) is appreciated for its beauty, fragrance and long period of flowering. To study the response of cut rose flower to bio-fertilizers, a factorial experiment was performed, with completely randomized design and four replications, in hydroponic greenhouse of Alandasht, Astane Ghods Garden, Mashhad, Iran, during 2009-2010. The first factor was six cultivars of rose flower including: Red ferover, Classic cezaanna, Rock feller, Rimini, Maroussia and Orange juice. The second factor was three biological fertilizers including biofarm, nitrajin and nitroxin and a noinoculated treatment (control). In this experiment, traits such as leaf area, number of nodes, number of branches, first flowering occurrence, vase life and percentage of nitrogen, potassium and calcium were measured in each treatment and the means were compared by Duncan Multiple Range Test. Results showed that the effect of cultivar and compound effect of cultivar and fertilizer for number of nodes, number of branches, first flowering date, vase life, leaf area and nitrogen, potassium and calcium concentration were significant (P<0.05). The effect of bio-fertilizer treatments on leaf area and concentration of nutrients was significant (P<0.05). The highest concentration of nutrients was observed in Red ferover cultivar. Interaction effect of cultivar and bio-fertilizer treatments showed that in the Red ferover, Classic cezaanna and Maroussia cultivars, the fertilizer treatments increased nitrogen concentration in the leaves. The biofarm and nitroxin fertilizers increased leaf calcium concentration in Red ferover and Rimini cultivars significantly (P<0.05). The nitrajin and nitroxin treatments reduced calcium concentration, as compared to control, in the Rock feller cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and cultivar-by-fertilizer effects were significant for the measured growth, flowering, vase-life and nutrient traits.

Taxon
ROSA HYBRIDARosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
cultivar and fertilizere0
Outcome
number of nodes, number of branches, first flowering datee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of cultivar and compound effect of cultivar and fertilizer for number of nodes, number of branches, first flowering date, vase life, leaf area and nitrogen, potassium and calcium concentration were significant (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA HYBRIDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer treatments significantly affected leaf area and nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
ROSA HYBRIDARosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
bio-fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf area and concentration of nutrientse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of bio-fertilizer treatments on leaf area and concentration of nutrients was significant (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA HYBRIDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red ferover had the highest nutrient concentration.

Taxon
ROSA HYBRIDARosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
Red ferovere0
Outcome
concentration of nutrientse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest concentration of nutrients was observed in Red ferover cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA HYBRIDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers increased leaf nitrogen concentration in Red ferover, Classic cezaanna and Maroussia.

Taxon
ROSA HYBRIDARosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
nitrogen concentration in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the Red ferover, Classic cezaanna and Maroussia cultivars, the fertilizer treatments increased nitrogen concentration in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA HYBRIDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofarm and nitroxin increased leaf calcium in Red ferover and Rimini.

Taxon
ROSA HYBRIDARosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
biofarm and nitroxin fertilizerse0
Outcome
leaf calcium concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biofarm and nitroxin fertilizers increased leaf calcium concentration in Red ferover and Rimini cultivars significantly (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA HYBRIDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrajin and nitroxin reduced calcium concentration in Rock feller relative to control.

Taxon
ROSA HYBRIDARosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
Rock fellere0
Treatment
nitrajin and nitroxin treatmentse0
Outcome
calcium concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrajin and nitroxin treatments reduced calcium concentration, as compared to control, in the Rock feller cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1782 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA HYBRIDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.