Paper · 2017 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Impact of Soil Amendments and Irrigation Water on Growth and Flowering of Rosa Plant Grown in Sandy Soil Rosa hybrida

G. El-Alsayed, Sohier; M.Ismail, Sahar

17
claims
39
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Pot experiments were conducted for two successive seasons in Antoniadis Garden, Ornamental Plant Research, Horticulture research Institute. Alexandria, Egypt. Rose plants were grown in sandy soil incorporated with organic compost of municipal solid waste (CMSW)at two levels (5 and 15% w/w) and polyacrylamide at two levels (0.1 and 0.2 % w/w) under irrigation regime at two rates (250ml/plant and 500 ml/plant / 3 times per week) to study their effect on the growth, flowering, water consumption, chemical contents of rose plants and improvement of hydro-physic-chemical properties of sandy soil under the study. The obtained results showed that the irrigation water rates did not significantly affect the vegetative parameters, the flowering characteristics except for the flowering time that was significantly reduced. The early flowering was recorded at the lower irrigation rate in the 2nd season. The K, chlorophyll and carbohydrates contents significantly increased in one season only. Anthocyanin content did not significantly increase. Pre-planting addition of CMSW at the higher level (15% w/w) significantly stimulated the vegetative parameters in the two seasons. The organic compost at level of 15% w/w of CMSW was more effective in promoting the early flowering (45.9 day) and the heavier flower dry weight (3.26g), prolonged vase life were 7.79 and 7.50 day, maximum number of flowers/plant were 7.82 and 5.08 in the two seasons, respectively. The tallest peduncle was 32.34 and 32.07 cm and the longest duration period was 5.72 and 6.19 in the two seasons, respectively. The N, P and K chemical contents, the total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and anthocyanin were significantly stimulated at the higher level (15% w/w) of CMSW compared to the lower level (5%w/w). Amendment of sandy soil with the hydrophilic synthetic polyacrylamide (PAM) at the level (0.2% w/w) significantly reduced the flowering time, while number of flowers/ plant and flower diameter as well as flower dry weight. The total chlorophyll and carbohydrates contents were significantly accumulated in the leaves as a result of utilizing PAM at level (0.2% w/w). Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) increase with increasing PAM concentrations. The study recommended to grow rose plants in sandy soil under amended with pre-planting organic compost (CMSW) at level (15% w/w) and PAM at level (0.2% w/w) with irrigation rate at 250 ml/ plant/ 3times per week.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation rate did not significantly affect vegetative or most flowering traits.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
irrigation water ratese0
Outcome
vegetative parameters, the flowering characteristicse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the irrigation water rates did not significantly affect the vegetative parameters, the flowering characteristics except for the flowering time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower irrigation rate advanced flowering in the second season.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
lower irrigation ratee0
Outcome
early floweringe0
Direction
earlye0
Qualifier
2nd seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The early flowering was recorded at the lower irrigation rate in the 2nd season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased K, chlorophyll and carbohydrates in one season only.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
irrigation water ratese1
Outcome
K, chlorophyll and carbohydrates contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
one season onlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The K, chlorophyll and carbohydrates contents significantly increased in one season only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation water rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation did not significantly increase anthocyanin content.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
irrigation water ratese1
Outcome
Anthocyanin contente0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin content did not significantly increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation water rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher compost level stimulated vegetative traits in both seasons.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
CMSW at the higher level (15% w/w)e0
Outcome
vegetative parameterse0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
two seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-planting addition of CMSW at the higher level (15% w/w) significantly stimulated the vegetative parameters in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% compost level promoted flowering at 45.9 day.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
15% w/w of CMSWe0
Outcome
early floweringe0
Direction
earlye0
Value
45.9 daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic compost at level of 15% w/w of CMSW was more effective in promoting the early flowering (45.9 day)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% compost level increased flower dry weight to 3.26g.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
15% w/w of CMSWe1
Outcome
flower dry weighte0
Direction
heaviere0
Value
3.26ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the heavier flower dry weight (3.26g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“15% w/w of CMSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% compost level prolonged vase life to 7.79 and 7.50 day across seasons.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
15% w/w of CMSWe1
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
prolongede0
Value
7.79 and 7.50 daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prolonged vase life were 7.79 and 7.50 day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“15% w/w of CMSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% compost level gave maximum flower numbers of 7.82 and 5.08 in two seasons.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
15% w/w of CMSWe1
Outcome
number of flowers/plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.82 and 5.08e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of flowers/plant were 7.82 and 5.08 in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“15% w/w of CMSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% compost level produced peduncles of 32.34 and 32.07 cm in two seasons.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
15% w/w of CMSWe1
Outcome
pedunclee0
Direction
talleste0
Value
32.34 and 32.07 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tallest peduncle was 32.34 and 32.07 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“15% w/w of CMSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% compost level gave longest flower duration of 5.72 and 6.19.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
15% w/w of CMSWe1
Outcome
duration periode0
Direction
longeste0
Value
5.72 and 6.19e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the longest duration period was 5.72 and 6.19 in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“15% w/w of CMSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher compost increased N, P and K content relative to 5% compost.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
higher level (15% w/w) of CMSWe0
Outcome
N, P and K chemical contentse0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
lower level (5%w/w)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N, P and K chemical contents, the total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and anthocyanin were significantly stimulated at the higher level (15% w/w) of CMSW compared to the lower level (5%w/w).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher compost increased chlorophyll, carbohydrates and anthocyanin relative to 5% compost.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
higher level (15% w/w) of CMSWe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and anthocyanine0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
lower level (5%w/w)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N, P and K chemical contents, the total chlorophyll, carbohydrates and anthocyanin were significantly stimulated at the higher level (15% w/w) of CMSW compared to the lower level (5%w/w).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PAM at 0.2% reduced flowering time and flower number, diameter and dry weight.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
polyacrylamide (PAM) at the level (0.2% w/w)e0
Outcome
flowering timee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendment of sandy soil with the hydrophilic synthetic polyacrylamide (PAM) at the level (0.2% w/w) significantly reduced the flowering time, while number of flowers/ plant and flower diameter as well as flower dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1779–2001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PAM at 0.2% increased leaf chlorophyll and carbohydrate contents.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
PAM at level (0.2% w/w)e0
Outcome
total chlorophyll and carbohydrates contentse0
Direction
accumulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total chlorophyll and carbohydrates contents were significantly accumulated in the leaves as a result of utilizing PAM at level (0.2% w/w).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2002–2145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturated hydraulic conductivity increased with PAM concentration.

Treatment
PAM concentrationse0
Outcome
Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) increase with increasing PAM concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2230 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 15% CMSW and 0.2% PAM with 250 ml irrigation three times weekly for roses in sandy soil.

Taxon
rose plantse0
Outcome
grow rose plants in sandy soil under amended with pre-planting organic compost (CMSW) at level (15% w/w) and PAM at level (0.2% w/w) with irrigation rate at 250 ml/ plant/ 3times per weeke0

Verbatim

e0

“The study recommended to grow rose plants in sandy soil under amended with pre-planting organic compost (CMSW) at level (15% w/w) and PAM at level (0.2% w/w) with irrigation rate at 250 ml/ plant/ 3times per week.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2444 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · phenology · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.