Paper · 2015 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Evaluation of Flowering Pattern, Yield and Yield Determinants of Hybrid Tea Rose in Response to Seasonal Variations and Applied Organic Manure Rates

Olusegun Olufemi Olubode; Sola Uthman Adekola; Sukurat Modupe Idowu

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seasonal variations in environmental conditions can have significant influence on flowering pattern and yield of roses. Evaluation studies were conducted to determine the flowering pattern and yield determinants of two Hybrid Tea rose cultivars in response to seasonal variations under rain-fed conditions. The 2 × 2 × 4 factorial experiment arranged in split plot design at three replications was conducted at two seasons (dry and wet) using two cultivars (cv. “Immaculate” and “P.H. Baby”, white and red flowers respectively) supplied with poultry manure (PM) application rates at 5, 10 and 20 t/ha where the unfertilized (0 t/ha) served as control. The result showed that the year two environmental conditions of both experiment I and II significantly improved plant height, number of leaves, number of buds (CNB) and opened flowers (CNF) and flower yield (FYD). “Immaculate” was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) taller with more leaves but thinner girth. Although generally lower in NF/NB, and not different in FYD, the “P.H. Baby” had more flowers (CNB and CNF) in experiment I. Except for no significant difference in FYD and lower NF/NB recorded by all manure rates compared to control in experiment II, plants treated with 5 t/ha PM recorded more flowers (CNB and CNF). Significant first and second order interaction effects (p ≤ 0.05) showed that “Immaculate” had taller height and more leaves but “P.H. Baby” had more CNB and CNF, although both were not different in FYD. In addition, plants supplied with 5 t/ha PM rates were better in plant height, number of leaves, CNB and CNF compared to other manure rates. In conclusion, year two environmental conditions supported better crop growth and yield, “Immaculate” grew better vegetatively but both were not different in floral yield, while the 5 t/ha PM was considered the optimum manure application rate under the rain-fed condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year-two environmental conditions significantly improved plant height and number of leaves of Hybrid Tea roses in both experiments.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
year two environmental conditionse0
Outcome
plant height, number of leavese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“year two environmental conditions of both experiment I and II significantly improved plant height, number of leaves, number of buds (CNB) and opened flowers (CNF) and flower yield (FYD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year-two environmental conditions significantly improved the number of buds, opened flowers and flower yield of Hybrid Tea roses in both experiments.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
year two environmental conditionse0
Outcome
number of buds (CNB) and opened flowers (CNF) and flower yield (FYD)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“year two environmental conditions of both experiment I and II significantly improved plant height, number of leaves, number of buds (CNB) and opened flowers (CNF) and flower yield (FYD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–864 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar Immaculate was significantly taller with more leaves than P.H. Baby.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
Immaculatee0
Outcome
taller with more leavese0
Direction
tallere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

““Immaculate” was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) taller with more leaves but thinner girth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–949 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar Immaculate had significantly thinner girth than P.H. Baby.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
Immaculatee0
Outcome
thinner girthe0
Direction
thinnere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

““Immaculate” was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) taller with more leaves but thinner girth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–949 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar P.H. Baby had more flowers (buds and opened flowers) than Immaculate in experiment I.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
P.H. Babye0
Outcome
flowers (CNB and CNF)e0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Although generally lower in NF/NB, and not different in FYD, the “P.H. Baby” had more flowers (CNB and CNF) in experiment I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1074 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P.H. Baby did not differ from Immaculate in flower yield.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
P.H. Babye0
Outcome
FYDe0
Direction
not differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Although generally lower in NF/NB, and not different in FYD, the “P.H. Baby” had more flowers (CNB and CNF) in experiment I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1074 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P.H. Baby was generally lower in NF/NB than Immaculate.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
P.H. Babye0
Outcome
NF/NBe0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Although generally lower in NF/NB, and not different in FYD, the “P.H. Baby” had more flowers (CNB and CNF) in experiment I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment II all poultry manure rates produced no significant difference in flower yield compared with the control.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
all manure ratese0
Outcome
FYDe0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“no significant difference in FYD and lower NF/NB recorded by all manure rates compared to control in experiment II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment II all poultry manure rates produced lower NF/NB than the control.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
all manure ratese0
Outcome
NF/NBe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“no significant difference in FYD and lower NF/NB recorded by all manure rates compared to control in experiment II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants treated with 5 t/ha poultry manure produced more flowers (buds and opened flowers).

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
5 t/ha PMe0
Outcome
flowers (CNB and CNF)e0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants treated with 5 t/ha PM recorded more flowers (CNB and CNF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants supplied with 5 t/ha poultry manure were better in plant height and number of leaves than with other manure rates.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
5 t/ha PM ratese0
Outcome
plant height, number of leavese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other manure ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants supplied with 5 t/ha PM rates were better in plant height, number of leaves, CNB and CNF compared to other manure rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants supplied with 5 t/ha poultry manure had more buds and opened flowers than with other manure rates.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
5 t/ha PM ratese0
Outcome
CNB and CNFe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other manure ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants supplied with 5 t/ha PM rates were better in plant height, number of leaves, CNB and CNF compared to other manure rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1613 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider 5 t/ha poultry manure the optimum application rate for Hybrid Tea roses under rain-fed conditions.

Taxon
Hybrid Tea RoseRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
5 t/ha PMe0
Outcome
optimum manure application ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Tea Rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“the 5 t/ha PM was considered the optimum manure application rate under the rain-fed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1886 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.