Paper · 2013 · Progress in Plant Protection

The influence of selected fungicides used at different dates on residues in apples and protection against storage diseases

Jolanta Szymczak; Hanna Bryk; Artur Miszczak

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The level of residues of active substances of the fungicides Captan 80 WG and Thiram Granuflo 80 WG applied in protection against apple storage diseases and their effectiveness were investigated. Captan 80 WG was used to protect against bull`s eye rot of cultivar Szampion apples in 11 protection programs, in which it was applied from 1 to 4 treatments at various combinations of terms (28, 21, 14, 7 days before harvest). Thiram Granuflo 80 WG was used against storage scab of cultivar Jonagored apples in 4 protection programs, in which the treatments were applied in terms: 14 and 7 days before harvest. Fruits from trees not treated with the fungicides were regard as the control. It was found, that double application of the Captan 80 WG in terms of 21 and 14 days before harvest was safe for captan residues in apples, and had a very good efficacy against bull`s eye rot of apples. In turn, Thiram Granuflo 80 WG significantly restricted the storage scab after one application, only at low disease severity. However, when the infection was higher, significant effectiveness was obtained by double use of Thiram Granuflo 80 WG while the content of CS2, as dithiocarbamates indicator met the standard requirements. Badano w jabłkach poziom pozostałości substancji czynnych preparatów Captan 80 WG i Thiram Granuflo 80 WG zastosowanych przed zbiorem w różnych programach zwalczania chorób przechowalniczych oraz oceniano skuteczność tych programów. Captan 80 WG zastosowano na odmianie Szampion w 11 programach ochrony przed gorzką zgnilizną jabłek, w których wykonywano od 1 do 4 zabiegów w różnych kombinacjach terminów (28, 21, 14, 7 dni przed zbiorem). Thiram Granuflo 80 WG zastosowano przeciwko parchowi przechowalniczemu na odmianie Jonagored w 4 programach, w których wykonywano zabiegi w terminach 14 i 7 dni przed zbiorem. Kontrolę stanowiły owoce z drzew nieopryskiwanych w tych terminach żadnymi fungicydami. Stwierdzono, że dwukrotne zastosowanie Captanu 80 WG w terminach 21 i 14 dni przed zbiorem nie powodowało przekroczenia poziomu pozostałości kaptanu w jabłkach oraz bardzo dobrze chroniło jabłka przed gorzką zgnilizną. Z kolei Thiram Granuflo 80 WG istotnie ograniczał parcha przechowalniczego po jednokrotnym zastosowaniu, gdy nasilenie choroby było niewielkie. Natomiast, gdy zakażenie parchem było silniejsze istotną skuteczność w zwalczaniu uzyskano po dwukrotnym zastosowaniu środka Thiram Granuflo 80 WG, przy jednoczesnym spełnieniu norm na zawartość CS2 w jabłkach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double application of Captan 80 WG 21 and 14 days before harvest was safe for captan residues in apples.

Treatment
double application of the Captan 80 WG in terms of 21 and 14 days before harveste3
Outcome
captan residuese3
Comparator
Fruits from trees not treated with the fungicidese6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“It was found, that double application of the Captan 80 WG in terms of 21 and 14 days before harvest was safe for captan residues in apples, and had a very good efficacy against bull`s eye rot of apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–887 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruits from trees not treated with the fungicides were regard as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double application of Captan 80 WG had a very good efficacy against bull`s eye rot of apples.

Treatment
double application of the Captan 80 WGe3
Outcome
efficacy against bull`s eye rote3
Direction
very goode3
Comparator
Fruits from trees not treated with the fungicidese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“It was found, that double application of the Captan 80 WG in terms of 21 and 14 days before harvest was safe for captan residues in apples, and had a very good efficacy against bull`s eye rot of apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–887 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruits from trees not treated with the fungicides were regard as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One application of Thiram Granuflo 80 WG significantly restricted storage scab only at low disease severity.

Treatment
Thiram Granuflo 80 WGe4
Outcome
storage scabe4
Direction
restrictede4
Qualifier
after one application, only at low disease severitye4
Comparator
Fruits from trees not treated with the fungicidese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Thiram Granuflo 80 WG was used against storage scab of cultivar Jonagored apples in 4 protection programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–529 · show in text ↑
e4

“Thiram Granuflo 80 WG significantly restricted the storage scab after one application, only at low disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1013 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruits from trees not treated with the fungicides were regard as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double use of Thiram Granuflo 80 WG gave significant effectiveness when the infection was higher.

Treatment
double use of Thiram Granuflo 80 WGe5
Outcome
effectivenesse5
Qualifier
when the infection was highere5
Comparator
Fruits from trees not treated with the fungicidese6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Thiram Granuflo 80 WG was used against storage scab of cultivar Jonagored apples in 4 protection programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–529 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, when the infection was higher, significant effectiveness was obtained by double use of Thiram Granuflo 80 WG while the content of CS2, as dithiocarbamates indicator met the standard requirements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1218 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruits from trees not treated with the fungicides were regard as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–684 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CS2 content of apples met the standard requirements after Thiram Granuflo 80 WG double use.

Outcome
content of CS2e5
Qualifier
met the standard requirementse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Thiram Granuflo 80 WG was used against storage scab of cultivar Jonagored apples in 4 protection programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–529 · show in text ↑
e5

“while the content of CS2, as dithiocarbamates indicator met the standard requirements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1218 · show in text ↑

captan · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Captan had little effect on PMC curative activity.

    Glasshouse experiments on apple scab · 1967 · compared with PMC

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiram · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

captan · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.