Paper · 2001 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Callus Development and Indirect Shoot Regeneration from Seedling Explants of Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgarisL.) Cultured In Vitro

Songül Gürel

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

For callus production, hypocotyl, cotyledon, petiole and leaf explants from seedlings of different sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) breeding lines were cultured on MS medium containing BAP or KIN in combination with NAA or 2,4-D at 0.0, 0.5 or 1.0 mg/l. The use of both auxins in combination with 0.5 mg/l BAP or 0.5 mg/l KIN resulted in greater amounts of callus from all types of explants. However, hypocotyl and cotyledon explants produced significantly more callus than petiole and leaf explants when the means of all lines were taken into account. Two types of callus were usually obtained, white and friable callus with large cells (Type I) and green and compact callus with smaller cells (Type II). For shoot induction, Type I callus was transferred to MS medium containing 2.5 mg/l TDZ or 1.0 mg/l BAP in combination with 0.3 mg/l IAA, together with or without a cold pre-treatment at 4¡C for two weeks. More shoots developed from the pre-treated callus and elongated shoots could be readily rooted on MS medium containing 3.0 mg/l IBA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both auxins with 0.5 mg/l BAP produced greater callus from all explant types.

Treatment
both auxins in combination with 0.5 mg/l BAPe0
Outcome
amounts of calluse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of both auxins in combination with 0.5 mg/l BAP or 0.5 mg/l KIN resulted in greater amounts of callus from all types of explants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgarisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both auxins with 0.5 mg/l KIN produced greater callus from all explant types.

Treatment
0.5 mg/l KINe0
Outcome
amounts of calluse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of both auxins in combination with 0.5 mg/l BAP or 0.5 mg/l KIN resulted in greater amounts of callus from all types of explants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgarisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypocotyl and cotyledon explants yielded more callus than petiole and leaf explants.

Organ / stage
hypocotyl and cotyledon explantse0
Outcome
calluse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
petiole and leaf explantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hypocotyl and cotyledon explants produced significantly more callus than petiole and leaf explants when the means of all lines were taken into account”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgarisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two callus types were observed: white friable callus with large cells and green compact callus with smaller cells.

Outcome
white and friable callus with large cells (Type I) and green and compact callus with smaller cells (Type II)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two types of callus were usually obtained, white and friable callus with large cells (Type I) and green and compact callus with smaller cells (Type II).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgarisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold pretreatment produced more shoots from callus.

Treatment
pre-treated calluse0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
Moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More shoots developed from the pre-treated callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgarisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elongated shoots rooted readily on MS medium with 3.0 mg/l IBA.

Treatment
MS medium containing 3.0 mg/l IBAe0
Outcome
elongated shoots could be readily rootede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elongated shoots could be readily rooted on MS medium containing 3.0 mg/l IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet ( Beta vulgarisL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

class · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.