Paper · 2011 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Calcium sulfate ameliorates the effect of aluminum toxicity differentially in genotypes of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.)

M Reyes-Díaz; C Meriño-Gergichevich; E Alarcón; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
59
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effect of gypsum (CaSO 4 ) amendment in the reduction of Al phytotoxicity of blueberry cultivars differing in Al resistance (Legacy and Brigitta, Al-resistant and Bluegold, Al-sensitive) was studied in a Hoagland's nutrient solution under acidic conditions for 2 weeks.Treatments were: Control (Hoagland solution), 2.5 mM CaSO 4 , 5 mM CaSO 4 , 100 µM Al (AlCl 3 ), 100 µM Al + 2.5 mM CaSO 4 , 100 µM Al + 5 mM CaSO 4 .Physiological, biochemical and chemical features of leaves and roots were determined to establish the amendment efficiency in the reduction of Al toxicity in these cultivars.Results showed that under Al toxicity the three investigated cultivars accumulated high Al concentrations in leaves and roots.These concentrations decreased with CaSO 4 application.Statistically significant interactions among Al in leaves but not in roots (p=0.719) and cultivars (p<0.001), were found.The lowest Ca concentration was found in the most Al-sensitive cultivar (Bluegold) and the highest in the more Al-resistant cultivars (Legacy and Brigitta).Among the underlying processes affected by Al stress in these blueberry cultivars the most evident changes were exhibited by the Al-sensitive cultivar Bluegold, where the photosynthetic performance decreased showing a slight recovery in presence of gypsum amendment at the end of experiment.Instead, the more Al-resistant cultivar (Legacy) did not change its photosynthetic parameters in presence of the gypsum amendments during the treatment, whereas in Brigitta, only a slight recovery at the end of treatment was evidenced by the gypsum application.Thus, in relation to these parameters the gypsum amendment was efficient in complete recovery from the toxic Al effect in the Al-resistant cultivar Brigitta and a slight recovery of the toxic Al effect in the Al-sensitive cultivar Bluegold.Nonetheless, this amendment is a good alternative to ameliorate Al toxicity in Al-sensitive cultivars and additionally provides a good source of Ca and S.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum toxicity led to high aluminum accumulation in leaves and roots of all three cultivars.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
Al toxicitye0
Outcome
high Al concentrationse0

Verbatim

e0

“under Al toxicity the three investigated cultivars accumulated high Al concentrations in leaves and roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum application reduced aluminum concentrations in blueberry leaves and roots.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Treatment
CaSO 4 applicatione0
Outcome
Al concentrationse1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“These concentrations decreased with CaSO 4 application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“under Al toxicity the three investigated cultivars accumulated high Al concentrations in leaves and roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf aluminum showed a significant cultivar interaction, unlike root aluminum.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
Al in leavese0
Qualifier
p<0.001e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Statistically significant interactions among Al in leaves but not in roots (p=0.719) and cultivars (p<0.001), were found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root aluminum did not show a significant cultivar interaction.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
in rootse0
Qualifier
p=0.719e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Statistically significant interactions among Al in leaves but not in roots (p=0.719) and cultivars (p<0.001), were found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bluegold had the lowest calcium concentration.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Material
Bluegolde0
Outcome
Ca concentratione0
Direction
loweste0

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest Ca concentration was found in the most Al-sensitive cultivar (Bluegold) and the highest in the more Al-resistant cultivars (Legacy and Brigitta).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legacy and Brigitta had the highest calcium concentrations.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Material
Legacy and Brigittae0
Outcome
Ca concentratione0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest Ca concentration was found in the most Al-sensitive cultivar (Bluegold) and the highest in the more Al-resistant cultivars (Legacy and Brigitta).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic performance decreased under aluminum stress in Bluegold.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Material
Bluegolde0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
photosynthetic performancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the Al-sensitive cultivar Bluegold, where the photosynthetic performance decreased showing a slight recovery in presence of gypsum amendment at the end of experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum slightly restored photosynthetic performance in Bluegold at the end of the experiment.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Material
Bluegolde0
Treatment
gypsum amendmente0
Outcome
photosynthetic performancee0
Direction
recoverye0
Qualifier
at the end of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the Al-sensitive cultivar Bluegold, where the photosynthetic performance decreased showing a slight recovery in presence of gypsum amendment at the end of experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum amendment did not change photosynthetic parameters in Legacy.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Material
Legacye0
Treatment
gypsum amendmentse0
Outcome
photosynthetic parameterse0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the more Al-resistant cultivar (Legacy) did not change its photosynthetic parameters in presence of the gypsum amendments during the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum produced slight photosynthetic recovery in Brigitta at treatment end.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Material
Brigittae0
Treatment
gypsum applicatione0
Outcome
photosynthetic parameterse1
Direction
recoverye0
Qualifier
at the end of treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in Brigitta, only a slight recovery at the end of treatment was evidenced by the gypsum application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1607 · show in text ↑
e1

“photosynthetic parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors regard gypsum as a suitable aluminum toxicity amendment for sensitive cultivars and a source of calcium and sulfur.

Taxon
blueberryt0
Outcome
ameliorate Al toxicitye0
Qualifier
good source of Ca and Se0

Verbatim

e0

“this amendment is a good alternative to ameliorate Al toxicity in Al-sensitive cultivars and additionally provides a good source of Ca and S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–2001 · show in text ↑
t0

“blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: photosynthesis · VacciniumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.