Paper · 2012 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Ammonium as sole N source improves grain quality in wheat

Teresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal; Jon González‐Torralba; Luis M Arregui; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
54
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The skilful handling of N fertilizer, including N source type and its timing, is necessary to obtain maximum profitability in wheat crops in terms of production and quality. Studies on grain yield and quality with ammonium as sole N source have not yet been conducted. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of N source management (nitrate vs. ammonium), and splitting it into two or three amendments during the wheat life cycle, on grain yield and quality under irrigated conditions. RESULTS: This experiment demonstrates that Cezanne wheat plants growing with ammonium as exclusive N source are able to achieve the same yield as plants growing with nitrate and that individual wheat plants grown in irrigated pots can efficiently use late N applied in GS37. Ammonium nutrition increased both types of grain reserve proteins (gliadins and glutenins) and also increased the ratio gli/glu with respect to nitrate nutrition. The splitting of the N rate enhanced the ammonium effect on grain protein composition. CONCLUSIONS: The application of ammonium N source, especially when split into three amendments, has an analogous effect on grain protein content and composition to applications at a higher N rate, leading to higher N use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium as the sole N source gave Cezanne wheat the same yield as nitrate.

Material
Cezannee0
Treatment
ammonium as exclusive N sourcee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cezanne wheat plants growing with ammonium as exclusive N source are able to achieve the same yield as plants growing with nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated potted wheat efficiently used late N at GS37.

Treatment
late N applied in GS37e0
Outcome
efficiently use late Ne0
Setting
irrigated potse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual wheat plants grown in irrigated pots can efficiently use late N applied in GS37”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium increased gliadins relative to nitrate.

Treatment
Ammonium nutritione0
Outcome
gliadinse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
nitrate nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nutrition increased both types of grain reserve proteins (gliadins and glutenins) and also increased the ratio gli/glu with respect to nitrate nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium increased glutenins relative to nitrate.

Treatment
Ammonium nutritione0
Outcome
gluteninse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
nitrate nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nutrition increased both types of grain reserve proteins (gliadins and glutenins) and also increased the ratio gli/glu with respect to nitrate nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium increased the gliadin to glutenin ratio relative to nitrate.

Treatment
Ammonium nutritione0
Outcome
ratio gli/glue0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
nitrate nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nutrition increased both types of grain reserve proteins (gliadins and glutenins) and also increased the ratio gli/glu with respect to nitrate nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting the N rate enhanced the ammonium effect on grain protein composition.

Treatment
splitting of the N ratee0
Outcome
grain protein compositione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The splitting of the N rate enhanced the ammonium effect on grain protein composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium N, especially in three amendments, had an effect on grain protein content and composition analogous to a higher N rate.

Treatment
ammonium N sourcee0
Outcome
grain protein content and compositione0
Direction
analogouse0
Qualifier
especially when split into three amendmentse0
Comparator
applications at a higher N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of ammonium N source, especially when split into three amendments, has an analogous effect on grain protein content and composition to applications at a higher N rate, leading to higher N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium N led to higher N use efficiency.

Treatment
ammonium N sourcee0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of ammonium N source, especially when split into three amendments, has an analogous effect on grain protein content and composition to applications at a higher N rate, leading to higher N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 114 positive, 52 negative or no effect

113 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.