Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

IMPROVEMENT IN YIELD AND QUALITY OF KINNOW (CITRUS DELICIOSAXCITRUS NOBILIS) BY POTASSIUM FERTILIZATION

M. Yasin Ashraf; Attiya Gul; Muhammad Ashraf; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
45
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Citrus, especially Kinnow, fruit yield and quality in Pakistan is not competitive with other countries, which could be mainly attributed to a lack of good nutrient management for citrus orchards. Many of the soils under these orchards have been reported as deficient in potassium (K). Therefore, work was initiated for improving citrus fruit yield, size, and quality through K nutrition management. Experiments were conducted in four districts of Punjab including Faisalabad, Toba Tek Singh, Jhang, and Sargodha and four rates of potash, i.e., 0, 50, 75 and 100 kg dipotassium oxide (K2O) ha−1 were applied using sulfate of potash (SOP) along with recommended rates of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). Soils of all the selected sites were clay loam or sandy clay loam and deficient in K. The leaf analysis also showed that all the selected orchards were deficient in K. Application of K increased the fruit yield and quality but K at100 kg K2O ha−1 was more effective in increasing the fruit weight and size, and peel thickness than other K rates in all the selected orchards. Juice volume and percentage significantly increased when K was applied at 75 kg K2O ha−1 at all sites. Nutrient uptake like K, P, and N enhanced with the increase in K application rate, however, the highest calcium (Ca)+ magnesium (Mg) was recorded at 50 kg K2O ha−1. The results indicated that all rates of K application improved the fruit yield and quality and reduced fruit dropping, however, 75 kg K2O ha−1 rate was more effective as juice volume and percentage, total soluble solid (TSS)/acid ratio and nutrient uptake showed significant improvement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected orchard soils were deficient in K.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Outcome
deficient in Ke0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

e0

“Soils of all the selected sites were clay loam or sandy clay loam and deficient in K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves in all selected orchards were deficient in K.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
deficient in Ke0

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf analysis also showed that all the selected orchards were deficient in K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K application increased fruit yield and quality.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Treatment
Application of Ke0
Outcome
fruit yield and qualitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of K increased the fruit yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 kg K2O ha−1 increased fruit weight and size more than other K rates.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Treatment
100 kg K2O ha−1e0
Outcome
fruit weight and sizee0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
other K ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“K at100 kg K2O ha−1 was more effective in increasing the fruit weight and size, and peel thickness than other K rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 kg K2O ha−1 increased peel thickness more than other K rates.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Treatment
100 kg K2O ha−1e0
Outcome
peel thicknesse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
other K ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“K at100 kg K2O ha−1 was more effective in increasing the fruit weight and size, and peel thickness than other K rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 kg K2O ha−1 significantly increased juice volume and percentage.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Treatment
75 kg K2O ha−1e0
Outcome
Juice volume and percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at all sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Juice volume and percentage significantly increased when K was applied at 75 kg K2O ha−1 at all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K, P, and N uptake increased with K application rate.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Treatment
increase in K application ratee0
Outcome
Nutrient uptake like K, P, and Ne0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient uptake like K, P, and N enhanced with the increase in K application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1261 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest Ca and Mg was recorded at 50 kg K2O ha−1.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Treatment
50 kg K2O ha−1e0
Outcome
calcium (Ca)+ magnesium (Mg)e0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest calcium (Ca)+ magnesium (Mg) was recorded at 50 kg K2O ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All K rates reduced fruit dropping.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Treatment
all rates of K applicatione0
Outcome
fruit droppinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“all rates of K application improved the fruit yield and quality and reduced fruit dropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75 kg K2O ha−1 rate significantly improved TSS/acid ratio and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
KINNOWt0
Treatment
75 kg K2O ha−1e0
Outcome
total soluble solid (TSS)/acid ratio and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“75 kg K2O ha−1 rate was more effective as juice volume and percentage, total soluble solid (TSS)/acid ratio and nutrient uptake showed significant improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“KINNOW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.