Paper · 2009 · American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Salicylic Acid Protects Nitrate Reductase Activity, Growth and Proline in Amaranth and Tomato Plants during Water Deficit

Umebese

18
claims
25
verbatim quotes
59
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Problem statement: Seedlings of Amaranthus hybridus cv. NHAC-3 (large green, amaranth) and Lycopersicum esculentum cv. Roma (tomato) were subjected to 7 days water stress at Early Vegetative (EV), Late Vegetative (LV), Early Flowering (EF) and Late Flowering (LF) stages of growth to study the impact on leaf water potential (ψw), Nitrate Reductase Activity (NRA), growth (plant height, shoot and root biomass) and proline content of both plants. Approach: Two concentrations of salicylic acid (1 and 3 mM SA) were applied to stressed plants to study the level of protection given by SA to the plants. Leaf ψw was significantly reduced (p = 0.05) during stress treatment at nearly all stages of growth in both plants. Leaf ψw was in the range -0.25 to -1.42 (unstressed) and -1.45 to -2.02 (stressed) in tomato plants while in amaranth it was -0.7 to -1.62 (unstressed) and -1.62 to -2.68 (stressed). As 3 mM SA increased leaf ψw to values close to the control (unstressed plants). NRA was significantly (p = 0.05) reduced by stress treatment at the LV stage of amaranth, EF stage of tomato and LF stage of both plants. Results: Thus, the reduction of NRA was more pronounced at the reproductive stage of both plants. As 3 mM SA was effective in maintaining NRA at levels similar to the control in both plants. Stress treatment reduced plant height significantly (p = 0.05) at the vegetative stages of both plants and 3 mM was also effective in keeping plant height similar to the control. Though shoot biomass was affected by water stress, SA treatment was not very effective in preserving the biomass during stress. Root biomass of plants was reduced by stress treatment at the reproductive stage and only tomato plants responded positively to 3 mM SA. Proline content was only slightly increased at all stages of growth in stressed plants but 3 mM SA induced a two-fold increase in proline content at the vegetative stage of tomato (EV and LV) and significant increases (p = 0.05) at almost all stages of growth of amaranth. Conclusion/Recommendations: The build up of proline, an osmolyte, by SA in stressed plants increased the capacity of plants to absorb water from the soil as shown by the increase in leaf ψw of both plants from -1.45 to -0.25 . SA was more effective in protecting the plants against the adverse effects of water stress when the stress was given at the vegetative stages (EV and LV) than at the flowering stages (EF and LF).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced leaf water potential in tomato.

Treatment
stressede0
Outcome
Leaf ψwe0
Value
-1.45 to -2.02e0
Comparator
unstressede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf ψw was in the range -0.25 to -1.42 (unstressed) and -1.45 to -2.02 (stressed) in tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced leaf water potential in amaranth.

Treatment
stressede0
Outcome
Leaf ψwt0
Value
-1.62 to -2.68e0
Comparator
unstressede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in amaranth it was -0.7 to -1.62 (unstressed) and -1.62 to -2.68 (stressed).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leaf ψw was significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

3 mM salicylic acid increased leaf water potential toward control values.

Taxon
Amaranth and Tomato PlantsAmaranthus caudatusSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
3 mM SAe0
Outcome
leaf ψwe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As 3 mM SA increased leaf ψw to values close to the control (unstressed plants).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranth and Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress reduced nitrate reductase activity at late vegetative stage in amaranth.

Organ / stage
LV stagee0
Treatment
stress treatmente0
Outcome
NRAe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NRA was significantly (p = 0.05) reduced by stress treatment at the LV stage of amaranth, EF stage of tomato and LF stage of both plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress reduced nitrate reductase activity at early flowering stage in tomato.

Organ / stage
EF stagee0
Treatment
stress treatmente0
Outcome
NRAe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NRA was significantly (p = 0.05) reduced by stress treatment at the LV stage of amaranth, EF stage of tomato and LF stage of both plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress reduced nitrate reductase activity at late flowering stage in both plants.

Taxon
both plantse0
Organ / stage
LF stagee0
Treatment
stress treatmente0
Outcome
NRAe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“NRA was significantly (p = 0.05) reduced by stress treatment at the LV stage of amaranth, EF stage of tomato and LF stage of both plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

3 mM salicylic acid maintained nitrate reductase activity near control levels in both plants.

Taxon
both plantse0
Treatment
3 mM SAe0
Outcome
NRAe0
Direction
maintaininge0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“As 3 mM SA was effective in maintaining NRA at levels similar to the control in both plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress reduced plant height at vegetative stages in both plants.

Taxon
both plantse0
Organ / stage
vegetative stagese0
Treatment
Stress treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stress treatment reduced plant height significantly (p = 0.05) at the vegetative stages of both plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

3 mM salicylic acid kept plant height similar to control.

Taxon
Amaranth and Tomato PlantsAmaranthus caudatusSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
3 mMe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3 mM was also effective in keeping plant height similar to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranth and Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress affected shoot biomass.

Taxon
Amaranth and Tomato PlantsAmaranthus caudatusSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Though shoot biomass was affected by water stress, SA treatment was not very effective in preserving the biomass during stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranth and Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid was not very effective at preserving shoot biomass under stress.

Taxon
Amaranth and Tomato PlantsAmaranthus caudatusSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treatment was not very effective in preserving the biomass during stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranth and Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress reduced root biomass at reproductive stage.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Organ / stage
reproductive stagee0
Treatment
stress treatmente0
Outcome
Root biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root biomass of plants was reduced by stress treatment at the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only tomato root biomass responded positively to 3 mM salicylic acid.

Treatment
3 mM SAe0
Outcome
Root biomasst0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only tomato plants responded positively to 3 mM SA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root biomass of plants was reduced by stress treatment at the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline rose slightly under stress across growth stages.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
stressede0
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all stages of growthe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content was only slightly increased at all stages of growth in stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

3 mM salicylic acid doubled tomato proline at vegetative stages.

Organ / stage
vegetative stagee0
Treatment
3 mM SAe0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
two-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3 mM SA induced a two-fold increase in proline content at the vegetative stage of tomato (EV and LV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

3 mM salicylic acid significantly raised amaranth proline at almost all growth stages.

Treatment
3 mM SAt0
Outcome
proline contentt0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increases (p = 0.05) at almost all stages of growth of amaranth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2027 · show in text ↑
t0

“3 mM SA induced a two-fold increase in proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1900 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded salicylic acid induced proline aided soil water absorption.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
SAe0
Compound
prolinee0
Outcome
capacity of plants to absorb water from the soile0

Verbatim

e0

“The build up of proline, an osmolyte, by SA in stressed plants increased the capacity of plants to absorb water from the soil as shown by the increase in leaf ψw of both plants from -1.45 to -0.25 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2056–2254 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid protection was greater at vegetative than flowering stages.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
protecting the plants against the adverse effects of water stresse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
flowering stagese0

Verbatim

e0

“SA was more effective in protecting the plants against the adverse effects of water stress when the stress was given at the vegetative stages (EV and LV) than at the flowering stages (EF and LF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2255–2450 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

drought · growth · Amaranthus caudatus (amaranth)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 27 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.