Paper · 2013 · African Journal of Microbiology Research

Growth responses of Triticum aestivum after inoculating with Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas

Yasin Muhammad; Faisal Muhammad; Sik; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Three bacterial strains (Pseudomonas species, P1; Pseudomonas mendocina, P2; andStenotrophomonas maltophilia, S3) were investigated in this study to assess their growth stimulatory effects on Triticum aestivum plants. These strains are Gram negative, motile, aerobic rods with catalase and oxidase positive. In general, seed inoculations of these bacteria (mono and mixed cultures) promoted germination, early growth parameters, auxin content, soluble protein content, peroxidase and acid phosphatase activity relative to non-inoculated control seedlings. Mixed cultures inoculations resulted in some decrease in various growth parameters. Almost 15 to 43% decrease in dry weight of plants was observed as compared to non-inoculated control. Bacterial inoculation (Pseudomonassp., P1) resulted in significantly higher acid phosphatase (40%) and peroxidase (39.7%)contents of plant when compared with non-inoculated control. Mixed culture combination showed pronounced synergistic effects relative to respective monocultures. Key words: Pseudomonas, Triticum aestivum, auxin, acid phosphatase, peroxidase,Stenotrophomonas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with the bacteria promoted germination and early growth parameters of wheat relative to non-inoculated seedlings.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
seed inoculations of these bacteria (mono and mixed cultures)e0
Outcome
germination, early growth parameterse0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
non-inoculated control seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed inoculations of these bacteria (mono and mixed cultures) promoted germination, early growth parameters, auxin content, soluble protein content, peroxidase and acid phosphatase activity relative to non-inoculated control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with the bacteria promoted auxin content and soluble protein content of wheat relative to non-inoculated seedlings.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
seed inoculations of these bacteria (mono and mixed cultures)e0
Outcome
auxin content, soluble protein contente0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
non-inoculated control seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed inoculations of these bacteria (mono and mixed cultures) promoted germination, early growth parameters, auxin content, soluble protein content, peroxidase and acid phosphatase activity relative to non-inoculated control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with the bacteria promoted peroxidase and acid phosphatase activity of wheat relative to non-inoculated seedlings.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
seed inoculations of these bacteria (mono and mixed cultures)e0
Outcome
peroxidase and acid phosphatase activitye0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
non-inoculated control seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed inoculations of these bacteria (mono and mixed cultures) promoted germination, early growth parameters, auxin content, soluble protein content, peroxidase and acid phosphatase activity relative to non-inoculated control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas sp. P1 inoculation raised wheat acid phosphatase activity by 40% relative to non-inoculated control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Bacterial inoculation (Pseudomonassp., P1)e1
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase1symbiont
Outcome
acid phosphatasee1
Direction
highere1
Value
40%e1
Comparator
non-inoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacterial inoculation (Pseudomonassp., P1) resulted in significantly higher acid phosphatase (40%) and peroxidase (39.7%)contents of plant when compared with non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas sp. P1 inoculation raised wheat peroxidase activity by 39.7% relative to non-inoculated control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Bacterial inoculation (Pseudomonassp., P1)e1
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase1symbiont
Outcome
peroxidasee1
Direction
highere1
Value
39.7%e1
Comparator
non-inoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacterial inoculation (Pseudomonassp., P1) resulted in significantly higher acid phosphatase (40%) and peroxidase (39.7%)contents of plant when compared with non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed culture inoculation reduced various growth parameters of wheat to some extent.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Mixed cultures inoculationse2
Outcome
various growth parameterse2
Direction
decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mixed cultures inoculations resulted in some decrease in various growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–638 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weight of inoculated wheat plants decreased by 15 to 43% compared with non-inoculated control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
dry weight of plantse3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
15 to 43%e3
Comparator
non-inoculated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e3

“Almost 15 to 43% decrease in dry weight of plants was observed as compared to non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed culture combination showed pronounced synergistic effects on wheat relative to the respective monocultures.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Mixed culture combinatione4
Outcome
synergistic effectse4
Direction
pronouncede4
Comparator
respective monoculturese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mixed culture combination showed pronounced synergistic effects relative to respective monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1023 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Pseudomonas · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 58 positive, 7 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

42 papers: 42 positive, 0 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.