Paper · 2004 · Global Change Biology

Response of total night‐time respiration to differences in total daily photosynthesis for leaves in a Quercus rubra L. canopy: implications for modelling canopy CO2 exchange

David Whitehead; Kevin L. Griffin; Matthew H. Turnbull; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
106
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Measurements of photosynthesis and respiration were made on leaves in summer in a Quercus rubra L. canopy at approximately hourly intervals throughout 5 days and nights. Leaves were selected in the upper canopy in fully sunlit conditions (upper) and in the lower canopy (lower). In addition, leaves in the upper canopy were shaded (upper shaded) to decrease photosynthesis rates. The data were used to test the hypothesis that total night‐time respiration is dependent on total photosynthesis during the previous day and that the response is mediated through changes in storage in carbohydrate pools. Measurements were made on clear sunny days with similar solar irradiance and air temperature, except for the last day when temperature, especially at night, was lower than that for the previous days. Maximum rates of photosynthesis in the upper leaves (18.7 μmol m −2 s −1 ) were approximately four times higher than those in the lower leaves (4.3 μmol m −2 s −1 ) and maximum photosynthesis rates in the upper shaded leaves (8.0 μmol m −2 s −1 ) were about half those in the upper leaves. There was a strong linear relationship between total night‐time respiration and total photosynthesis during the previous day when rates of respiration were normalized to a fixed temperature of 20°C, removing the effects of temperature from this relationship. Measurements of specific leaf area, nitrogen and chlorophyll concentration and calculations of the maximum rate of carboxylation activity, V cmax , were not significantly different between upper and upper shaded leaves 5 days after the shading treatment was started. There were small, but significant decreases in the rate of apparent maximum electron transport at saturating irradiance, J max ( P> 0.05), and light use efficiency, ɛ ( P <0.05), for upper shaded leaves compared with those for upper leaves. This suggests that the duration of shading in the experiment was sufficient to initiate changes in the electron transport, but not the carboxylation processes of photosynthesis. Support for the hypothesis was provided from analysis of soluble sugar and starch concentrations in leaves. Respiration rates in the upper shaded leaves were lower than those expected from a relationship between respiration and soluble sugar concentration for fully exposed upper and lower leaves. However, there was no similar difference in starch concentrations. This suggests that shading for the duration of several days did not affect sugar concentrations but reduced starch concentrations in leaves, leading to lower rates of respiration at night. A model was used to quantify the significance of the findings on estimated canopy CO 2 exchange for the full growing season. Introducing respiration as a function of total photosynthesis on the previous day resulted in a decrease in growing season night‐time respiration by 23% compared with the value when respiration was held constant. This highlights the need for a process‐based approach linking respiration to photosynthesis when modelling long‐term carbon exchange in forest ecosystems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper leaf maximum photosynthesis was about four times higher than lower leaf photosynthesis.

Taxon
Quercus rubra L.Quercus rubrae1
Outcome
Maximum rates of photosynthesise0
Direction
highere0
Value
18.7 μmol m −2 s −1e0
Qualifier
4.3 μmol m −2 s −1e0
Comparator
lower leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum rates of photosynthesis in the upper leaves (18.7 μmol m −2 s −1 ) were approximately four times higher than those in the lower leaves (4.3 μmol m −2 s −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–974 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus rubra L. canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaded upper leaves had about half the maximum photosynthesis of upper leaves.

Taxon
Quercus rubra L.Quercus rubrae1
Treatment
upper shaded leavese0
Outcome
maximum photosynthesis ratese0
Direction
about halfe0
Value
8.0 μmol m −2 s −1e0
Comparator
upper leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum photosynthesis rates in the upper shaded leaves (8.0 μmol m −2 s −1 ) were about half those in the upper leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus rubra L. canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Night respiration related linearly to previous-day photosynthesis at a fixed temperature.

Taxon
Quercus rubra L.Quercus rubrae1
Outcome
total night‐time respiratione0
Qualifier
20°Ce0
Comparator
total photosynthesis during the previous daye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a strong linear relationship between total night‐time respiration and total photosynthesis during the previous day when rates of respiration were normalized to a fixed temperature of 20°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1297 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus rubra L. canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area, nitrogen, chlorophyll and carboxylation measurements did not differ significantly with shading.

Taxon
Quercus rubra L.Quercus rubrae1
Treatment
upper shaded leavese0
Outcome
specific leaf area, nitrogen and chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
uppere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Measurements of specific leaf area, nitrogen and chlorophyll concentration and calculations of the maximum rate of carboxylation activity, V cmax , were not significantly different between upper and upper shaded leaves 5 days after the shading treatment was started”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1624 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus rubra L. canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased electron transport and light use efficiency.

Taxon
Quercus rubra L.Quercus rubrae1
Treatment
upper shaded leavese0
Outcome
rate of apparent maximum electron transport at saturating irradiance, J max ( P> 0.05), and light use efficiency, ɛ ( P <0.05)e0
Direction
decreasese0
Comparator
upper leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were small, but significant decreases in the rate of apparent maximum electron transport at saturating irradiance, J max ( P> 0.05), and light use efficiency, ɛ ( P <0.05), for upper shaded leaves compared with those for upper leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1865 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus rubra L. canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Respiration in shaded leaves was lower than expected from the sugar relationship.

Taxon
Quercus rubra L.Quercus rubrae1
Outcome
Respiration rates in the upper shaded leavese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
fully exposed upper and lower leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration rates in the upper shaded leaves were lower than those expected from a relationship between respiration and soluble sugar concentration for fully exposed upper and lower leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2341 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus rubra L. canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch concentrations lacked a similar difference.

Taxon
Quercus rubra L.Quercus rubrae1
Outcome
starch concentrationse0
Direction
no similar differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no similar difference in starch concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2352–2408 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus rubra L. canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A model with prior-day photosynthesis lowered estimated growing-season night respiration by 23%.

Taxon
Quercus rubra L.Quercus rubrae1
Outcome
growing season night‐time respiratione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
respiration was held constante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Introducing respiration as a function of total photosynthesis on the previous day resulted in a decrease in growing season night‐time respiration by 23% compared with the value when respiration was held constant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2724–2935 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus rubra L. canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑