Paper · 2012 · Journal of Clinical Oncology

Response of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Latief Ahmad; M. Kaleem; R. A. Bhat

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L). The obtained data showed that both grain and straw yield, and different yield attributing characters viz., number of spikes plant-1, spike weight and grain spike-1 were significantly maximum with application of 120 kg Nha-1 and the least with application of 30 kg Nha-1. Foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + nutrient mixture (F2) significantly increased the periodic plant height , dry weight plant-1 and number of tillers plant-1 over 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4). Foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm salicylic acid 100 ppm (F3) and 2% DAP + 1% KCl (F1) also recorded significantly higher values of these growth characters over F4 treatments. Both grain and straw yield and different yield contributing characters viz., spikes plant-1, spike weight, grains spike-1 and test weight were significantly higher with foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm nutrient mixture (F2) and significantly least with foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4). Key words: Nitrogen, nutrient mixture, foliar spray, yield and yield attributes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg Nha-1, wheat grain and straw yield were significantly maximal versus 30 kg Nha-1.

Treatment
application of 120 kg Nha-1e0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
application of 30 kg Nha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both grain and straw yield, and different yield attributing characters viz., number of spikes plant-1, spike weight and grain spike-1 were significantly maximum with application of 120 kg Nha-1 and the least with application of 30 kg Nha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg Nha-1, wheat spike number, spike weight, and grains per spike were significantly maximal versus 30 kg Nha-1.

Treatment
application of 120 kg Nha-1e0
Outcome
number of spikes plant-1, spike weight and grain spike-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
application of 30 kg Nha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of spikes plant-1, spike weight and grain spike-1 were significantly maximum with application of 120 kg Nha-1 and the least with application of 30 kg Nha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 foliar spray significantly raised wheat plant height, dry weight, and tiller number over F4.

Treatment
2% DAP + 1% KCl + nutrient mixture (F2)e0
Outcome
periodic plant height , dry weight plant-1 and number of tillers plant-1e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4)e0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + nutrient mixture (F2) significantly increased the periodic plant height , dry weight plant-1 and number of tillers plant-1 over 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F3 foliar spray gave significantly higher wheat growth characters than F4.

Treatment
2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm salicylic acid 100 ppm (F3)e0
Outcome
growth characterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
F4 treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm salicylic acid 100 ppm (F3) and 2% DAP + 1% KCl (F1) also recorded significantly higher values of these growth characters over F4 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 foliar spray gave significantly higher wheat growth characters than F4.

Treatment
2% DAP + 1% KCl (F1)e0
Outcome
growth characterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
F4 treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm salicylic acid 100 ppm (F3) and 2% DAP + 1% KCl (F1) also recorded significantly higher values of these growth characters over F4 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 foliar spray gave significantly higher grain and straw yield than F4.

Treatment
2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm nutrient mixture (F2)e0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4)e0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both grain and straw yield and different yield contributing characters viz., spikes plant-1, spike weight, grains spike-1 and test weight were significantly higher with foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm nutrient mixture (F2) and significantly least with foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 foliar spray gave significantly higher spikes per plant, spike weight, and grains per spike than F4.

Treatment
2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm nutrient mixture (F2)e0
Outcome
spikes plant-1, spike weight, grains spike-1e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4)e0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikes plant-1, spike weight, grains spike-1 and test weight were significantly higher with foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm nutrient mixture (F2) and significantly least with foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 foliar spray gave significantly higher test weight than F4.

Treatment
2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm nutrient mixture (F2)e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4)e0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“test weight were significantly higher with foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm nutrient mixture (F2) and significantly least with foliar spray of 2% DAP + 1% KCl + 100 ppm maleic hydrazide (F4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of nitrogen and foliar spray of nutrient mixture on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑

potassium chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

potassium chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

potassium chloride · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.