Paper · 2014 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Integrated moisture stress management in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Patil; A.S. Dhindwal; G. A. Rajanna

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 2010–11 and 2011–12 at Hisar, Haryana, to study integrated moisture stress management in wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol.]. The treatments consisted of 4 moisture regimes in main plots, viz. irrigation at crown-root initiation (CRI) + 100 mm cumulative pan evaporation (CPE), CRI + 150 mm CPE, CRI + 200 mm CPE and CRI only, and 6 moisture-stress management practices in sub plots, viz. no moisture stress-management, seed hardening (SH) by CaCl2, SH + KCl spray, SH + mycorrhizae application + KCl spray, SH + mycorrhizae + KCl spray + kaolin spray and Pusa hydrogel application. Significantly the highest plant height, numbers of tillers, leaf-area index, leaf-area duration, dry-matter accumulation and crop growth rate were recorded with irrigation at CRI + 100 mm CPE over irrigation at CRI only. Similarly significantly highest grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, spikes/m2, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, grain weight/spike, test weight and net returns were recorded with CRI + 100 mm CPE over irrigation at CRI only. The treatment SH + mycorrhizae + KCl spray + kaolin spray recorded significantly highest plant height, numbers of tillers, leaf-area index, leaf-area duration, dry-matter accumulation, crop-growth rate, spikes/m2, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, grain weight/spike and test weight over irrigation at CRI only. Significantly the highest grain and straw yields, as well as net returns were recorded in SH + mycorrhizae + KCl spray + kaolin spray over irrigation at CRI only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CRI plus 100 mm CPE gave significantly highest growth and canopy traits versus CRI alone.

Treatment
irrigation at CRI + 100 mm CPEe0
Outcome
plant height, numbers of tillers, leaf-area index, leaf-area duration, dry-matter accumulation and crop growth ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation at CRI onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly the highest plant height, numbers of tillers, leaf-area index, leaf-area duration, dry-matter accumulation and crop growth rate were recorded with irrigation at CRI + 100 mm CPE over irrigation at CRI only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CRI plus 100 mm CPE gave significantly highest grain and straw yields and harvest index versus CRI alone.

Treatment
CRI + 100 mm CPEe0
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield, harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation at CRI onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly significantly highest grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, spikes/m2, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, grain weight/spike, test weight and net returns were recorded with CRI + 100 mm CPE over irrigation at CRI only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CRI plus 100 mm CPE gave significantly highest spike and grain traits versus CRI alone.

Treatment
CRI + 100 mm CPEe0
Outcome
spikes/m2, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, grain weight/spike, test weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation at CRI onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly significantly highest grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, spikes/m2, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, grain weight/spike, test weight and net returns were recorded with CRI + 100 mm CPE over irrigation at CRI only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CRI plus 100 mm CPE gave significantly highest net returns versus CRI alone.

Treatment
CRI + 100 mm CPEe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation at CRI onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly significantly highest grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, spikes/m2, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, grain weight/spike, test weight and net returns were recorded with CRI + 100 mm CPE over irrigation at CRI only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed hardening plus mycorrhizae, KCl and kaolin gave highest growth and canopy traits versus CRI alone.

Treatment
SH + mycorrhizae + KCl spray + kaolin spraye0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, numbers of tillers, leaf-area index, leaf-area duration, dry-matter accumulation, crop-growth ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation at CRI onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment SH + mycorrhizae + KCl spray + kaolin spray recorded significantly highest plant height, numbers of tillers, leaf-area index, leaf-area duration, dry-matter accumulation, crop-growth rate, spikes/m2, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, grain weight/spike and test weight over irrigation at CRI only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined management treatment gave highest spike and grain traits versus CRI alone.

Treatment
SH + mycorrhizae + KCl spray + kaolin spraye0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
spikes/m2, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, grain weight/spike and test weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation at CRI onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment SH + mycorrhizae + KCl spray + kaolin spray recorded significantly highest plant height, numbers of tillers, leaf-area index, leaf-area duration, dry-matter accumulation, crop-growth rate, spikes/m2, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, grain weight/spike and test weight over irrigation at CRI only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave highest grain and straw yields and net returns versus CRI alone.

Treatment
SH + mycorrhizae + KCl spray + kaolin spraye0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
grain and straw yields, as well as net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation at CRI onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly the highest grain and straw yields, as well as net returns were recorded in SH + mycorrhizae + KCl spray + kaolin spray over irrigation at CRI only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–66 · show in text ↑

potassium chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

kaolin · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium chloride · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

kaolin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

in vitro · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 29 positive, 9 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

application · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 95 positive, 8 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.