Paper · 2006 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Silicon Decreases Transpiration Rate and Conductance from Stomata of Maize Plants

Xiaopeng Gao; Chunqin Zou; Lijun Wang; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
321
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT To characterize the effect of silicon (Si) on decreasing transpiration rate in maize (Zea mays L.) plants, the transpiration rate and conductance from both leaves and cuticula of maize plants were measured directly. Plants were grown in nutrient solutions with and without Si under both normal water conditions and drought stress [20% polyethylene glycol (PEG) concentration in nutrient solution] treatments. Silicon application of 2 mmol L−1 significantly decreased transpiration rate and conductance for both adaxial and abaxial leaf surface, but had no effect on transpiration rate and conductance from the cuticle. These results indicate that the role of Si in decreasing transpiration rate must be largely attributed to the reduction in transpiration rate from stomata rather than cuticula. Stomatal structure, element deposition, and stomatal density on both adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces were observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a light microscope. Results showed that changes in neither stomatal morphology nor stomatal density could explain the role of Si in decreasing stomatal transpiration of maize plants. Silicon application with H4SiO4 significantly increased Si concentration in shoots and roots of maize plants. Silicon concentration in shoots of maize plants was higher than in roots, whether or not Si was applied. Silicon deposits in cell walls of the leaf epidermis were mostly in the form of polymerized SiO2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application of 2 mmol L-1 significantly decreased transpiration rate and conductance from both leaf surfaces of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
adaxial and abaxial leaf surfacee1
Treatment
Silicon application of 2 mmol L−1e1
Outcome
transpiration rate and conductancee1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
without Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Silicon application of 2 mmol L−1 significantly decreased transpiration rate and conductance for both adaxial and abaxial leaf surface, but had no effect on transpiration rate and conductance from the cuticle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–626 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants were grown in nutrient solutions with and without Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon had no effect on transpiration rate and conductance from the cuticle of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Silicon application of 2 mmol L−1e1
Outcome
transpiration rate and conductance from the cuticlee1
Direction
had no effecte1
Comparator
without Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Silicon application of 2 mmol L−1 significantly decreased transpiration rate and conductance for both adaxial and abaxial leaf surface, but had no effect on transpiration rate and conductance from the cuticle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–626 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants were grown in nutrient solutions with and without Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Si-related reduction in transpiration is largely attributed to reduced transpiration through stomata rather than the cuticle.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Sie2
Outcome
transpiration ratee2
Qualifier
reduction in transpiration rate from stomata rather than cuticulae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“These results indicate that the role of Si in decreasing transpiration rate must be largely attributed to the reduction in transpiration rate from stomata rather than cuticula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in stomatal morphology and stomatal density could not explain the Si effect on stomatal transpiration of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Outcome
changes in neither stomatal morphology nor stomatal densitye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Results showed that changes in neither stomatal morphology nor stomatal density could explain the role of Si in decreasing stomatal transpiration of maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application with H4SiO4 significantly increased Si concentration in shoots and roots of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
Silicon application with H4SiO4e4
Outcome
Si concentration in shoots and rootse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Silicon application with H4SiO4 significantly increased Si concentration in shoots and roots of maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1257 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si concentration in maize shoots was higher than in roots, whether or not Si was applied.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse5
Outcome
Silicon concentration in shootse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
rootse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Silicon concentration in shoots of maize plants was higher than in roots, whether or not Si was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1362 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon deposits in leaf epidermal cell walls of maize were mostly polymerized SiO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leaf epidermise6
Outcome
Silicon deposits in cell wallse6
Qualifier
mostly in the form of polymerized SiO2e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Silicon deposits in cell walls of the leaf epidermis were mostly in the form of polymerized SiO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.