Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Bone char as phosphorus fertilizer involved in cadmium immobilization in lettuce, wheat, and potato cropping

Nina Siebers; Frauke Godlinski; Peter Leinweber

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Bone char is a potential clean and renewable P fertilizer with Cd‐immobilization capabilities, but the P–Cd interactions in cropping of vegetable, grain, and tuber crops are unknown. In the present pot experiment bone char was evaluated on its effect on the growth and P supply of various crops (lettuce, wheat, potatoes) as well as its capability to reduce the uptake of Cd from a moderately Cd‐contaminated and P‐deficient soil (soil 1) and a highly Cd‐contaminated soil with sufficient P supply (soil 2). When averaging the dry‐matter yield over the treatments for each crop for the P‐sufficient soil 1, the following order was obtained: triple superphosphate (TSP) > diammonium phosphate (DAP) > BC, whereas for the soil 2 with sufficient P supply it was inverted with BC > DAP > TSP. The P‐deficiency resulted in a more pronounced effect of TSP and DAP on the plant growth, whereas P sufficiency in the soil promoted a crop‐quality‐enhancing effect of bone char. The Cd concentration in the consumption‐relevant plant parts was mostly insignificantly affected by treatments; however, the total Cd concentration in the whole plants tended to decrease with fertilizer addition for all crops in soil 1 even at very low bone‐char application levels. Similar results were obtained for soil 2 with an exception for the Cd concentration in potatoes, as the total Cd concentration was significantly increased in the TSP and DAP treatments. This most likely results from the introduction of Cd with TSP and DAP as they contained ≈ 27–28 mg Cd kg –1 . Thus, this study demonstrated the potential of bone char as a clean P fertilizer, which can efficiently decrease the Cd contamination of potato on contaminated soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In soil 1, dry matter yield ranked TSP above DAP above bone char across the crops.

Treatment
triple superphosphate (TSP)e0
Outcome
dry‐matter yielde0
Direction
>e0
Comparator
diammonium phosphate (DAP)e0
Setting
soil 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry‐matter yield over the treatments for each crop for the P‐sufficient soil 1, the following order was obtained: triple superphosphate (TSP) > diammonium phosphate (DAP) > BC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–711 · show in text ↑
e1

“various crops (lettuce, wheat, potatoes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In soil 2, dry matter yield ranked bone char above DAP above TSP.

Treatment
BCe0
Outcome
dry‐matter yielde1
Direction
>e0
Comparator
DAPe0
Setting
soil 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the soil 2 with sufficient P supply it was inverted with BC > DAP > TSP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry‐matter yield over the treatments for each crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–586 · show in text ↑
e2

“various crops (lettuce, wheat, potatoes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–330 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P deficiency increased the growth benefit of TSP and DAP.

Treatment
TSP and DAPe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P‐deficiency resulted in a more pronounced effect of TSP and DAP on the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“various crops (lettuce, wheat, potatoes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–330 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P sufficiency promoted the crop quality benefit of bone char.

Treatment
bone chare0
Outcome
crop‐quality‐enhancing effecte0
Direction
promotede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P sufficiency in the soil promoted a crop‐quality‐enhancing effect of bone char”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“various crops (lettuce, wheat, potatoes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments mostly did not significantly change cadmium concentration in edible plant parts.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Cd concentration in the consumption‐relevant plant partse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cd concentration in the consumption‐relevant plant parts was mostly insignificantly affected by treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1087 · show in text ↑
e1

“various crops (lettuce, wheat, potatoes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer addition tended to decrease whole-plant cadmium concentration in soil 1 across the crops.

Treatment
fertilizer additione0
Outcome
total Cd concentration in the whole plantse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
tendede0
Setting
soil 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total Cd concentration in the whole plants tended to decrease with fertilizer addition for all crops in soil 1 even at very low bone‐char application levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“various crops (lettuce, wheat, potatoes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TSP and DAP significantly increased total cadmium concentration in potatoes in soil 2.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
TSP and DAPe0
Outcome
total Cd concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
soil 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were obtained for soil 2 with an exception for the Cd concentration in potatoes, as the total Cd concentration was significantly increased in the TSP and DAP treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bone char can reduce cadmium contamination of potatoes on contaminated soils.

Treatment
bone chare0
Outcome
Cd contamination of potatoe0
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
contaminated soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bone char as a clean P fertilizer, which can efficiently decrease the Cd contamination of potato on contaminated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1721 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 97 positive, 26 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

137 papers: 112 positive, 25 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.