Paper · 2007 · Lanzhou University Institutional Repository

Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of two sequence-replaced winter wheat in Loess Plateau, China

Lin Liu; Bingcheng Xu; Feng‐Min Li

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of irrigation on grain yield and water use efficiency was studied on two sequence replaced dryland winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars, Changwu 135 (CW, a new cultivar) and Pingliang 40 (PL, an old cultivar). Field experiments were carried out on Changwu country on Loess Plateau, China. Whereas the control plots were not irrigated at all, the treatment plots were irrigated three times, the quantity of irrigation being the same (40 mm) each time: at the jointing stage, at booting, and at flowering. Irrigation increased root biomass in each layer of soil in PL. Irrigation made PL produce greater root biomass in deeper soil, enabling the plants to tap larger quantities of water. CW had a harvest index (HI) greater by 0.11 than that of PL under both conditions, and lower shoot and root biomass, which indicates that more dry matter was transported to productive organs, leading to higher yields than PL. CW consumed more water to produce a unit quantity of root biomass and use irrigation less efficiently showing undercompensation, whereas PL showed overcompensation. Higher yield and greater water use efficiency in wheat appear to be associated with smaller root systems and higher harvest index irrespective of irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased root biomass in every soil layer of PL.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
PLe0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased root biomass in each layer of soil in PL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation gave PL greater root biomass in deeper soil.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
PLe0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
root biomass in deeper soile0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation made PL produce greater root biomass in deeper soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CW had a harvest index 0.11 greater than PL under both conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CWe0
Outcome
harvest index (HI)e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
0.11e0
Qualifier
under both conditionse0
Comparator
PLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CW had a harvest index (HI) greater by 0.11 than that of PL under both conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CW had lower shoot and root biomass than PL.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0e1
Material
CWe0e1
Outcome
shoot and root biomasse0e1
Direction
lowere0e1
Comparator
PLe0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and lower shoot and root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“CW had a harvest index (HI) greater by 0.11 than that of PL under both conditions, and lower shoot and root biomass, which indicates that more dry matter was transported to productive organs, leading to higher yields than PL. CW consumed more water to produce a unit quantity of root biomass and use irrigation less efficiently showing undercompensation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1060 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CW had higher yields than PL.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0e1
Material
CWe0e1
Outcome
yieldse0e1
Direction
highere0e1
Comparator
PLe0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to higher yields than PL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“CW had a harvest index (HI) greater by 0.11 than that of PL under both conditions, and lower shoot and root biomass, which indicates that more dry matter was transported to productive organs, leading to higher yields than PL. CW consumed more water to produce a unit quantity of root biomass and use irrigation less efficiently showing undercompensation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1060 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CW used more water per unit root biomass.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
CWe0
Outcome
water to produce a unit quantity of root biomasse0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CW consumed more water to produce a unit quantity of root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CW used irrigation less efficiently.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0e1
Material
CWe0e1
Outcome
irrigatione0e1
Direction
less efficientlye0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use irrigation less efficiently showing undercompensation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“CW had a harvest index (HI) greater by 0.11 than that of PL under both conditions, and lower shoot and root biomass, which indicates that more dry matter was transported to productive organs, leading to higher yields than PL. CW consumed more water to produce a unit quantity of root biomass and use irrigation less efficiently showing undercompensation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1060 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PL showed overcompensation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
PLe0
Outcome
overcompensatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PL showed overcompensation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher wheat yield and water use efficiency were associated with smaller root systems and higher harvest index irrespective of irrigation.

Organ / stage
root systemse0
Outcome
Higher yield and greater water use efficiencye0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
irrespective of irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yield and greater water use efficiency in wheat appear to be associated with smaller root systems and higher harvest index irrespective of irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1255 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.