Paper · 1999 · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Effects of water stress on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and photoinhibition in wheat plants

Congming Lu; Jianhua Zhang

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
154
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of water stress on photosynthesis, PS II photochemistry and photoinhibition were investigated in wheat plants ( Tritium aestivum L.). To separate water stress effects from photoinhibition, water stress was imposed at low irradiance (180 µmol m-2 s-1). When water stress developed gradually, net CO2 assimilation rate and leaf stomatal conductance decreased significantly. However, water stress had no effects on the PS II photochemistry in dark-adapted leaves. There were no significant changes in the maximal efficiency of PS II photochemistry and no apparent damages in PS II reaction centre, its oxidising and acceptor sides, or its antennae system. However, PS II photochemistry in light-adapted leaves was modified in water-stressed plants. This was shown by the decrease in the efficiency of excitation energy capture by open PS II reaction centres and the quantum yield of PS II electron transport and a significant increase in non-photochemical quenching. In addition, water stress increased the susceptibility to photoinhibition. The extent of photoinhibition became more pronounced as water stress increased. It was found that water-stressed plants exhibited a much greater accumulation of the Q B-non-reducing PS II reaction centres and a smaller increase in non- photochemical quenching during photoinhibition. Such changes might be responsible for the increased susceptibility to photoinhibition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly decreased net CO2 assimilation and leaf stomatal conductance.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
net CO2 assimilation rate and leaf stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When water stress developed gradually, net CO2 assimilation rate and leaf stomatal conductance decreased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–379 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress did not affect PS II photochemistry in dark-adapted leaves.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
dark-adapted leavese0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
PS II photochemistrye0
Direction
no effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress had no effects on the PS II photochemistry in dark-adapted leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximal PS II efficiency did not change significantly.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
maximal efficiency of PS II photochemistrye0
Direction
no significant changese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant changes in the maximal efficiency of PS II photochemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–552 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No apparent damage occurred in PS II reaction centre or antenna systems.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
no apparent damages in PS II reaction centre, its oxidising and acceptor sides, or its antennae systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no apparent damages in PS II reaction centre, its oxidising and acceptor sides, or its antennae system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased excitation capture efficiency and PS II electron transport quantum yield.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
water-stressede1
Outcome
efficiency of excitation energy capture by open PS II reaction centres and the quantum yield of PS II electron transporte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the decrease in the efficiency of excitation energy capture by open PS II reaction centres and the quantum yield of PS II electron transport”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“water-stressed plants exhibited a much greater accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly increased non-photochemical quenching.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
water-stressede1
Outcome
non-photochemical quenchinge0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in non-photochemical quenching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“water-stressed plants exhibited a much greater accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased susceptibility to photoinhibition.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
susceptibility to photoinhibitione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress increased the susceptibility to photoinhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoinhibition became more pronounced with increasing water stress.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
extent of photoinhibitione0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of photoinhibition became more pronounced as water stress increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-stressed plants accumulated more QB-non-reducing PS II centres during photoinhibition.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
water-stressede0
Outcome
accumulation of the Q B-non-reducing PS II reaction centrese0
Direction
much greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water-stressed plants exhibited a much greater accumulation of the Q B-non-reducing PS II reaction centres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-stressed plants had a smaller rise in non-photochemical quenching during photoinhibition.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
water-stressede1
Outcome
non- photochemical quenchinge0
Direction
smaller increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a smaller increase in non- photochemical quenching during photoinhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“water-stressed plants exhibited a much greater accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1204 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The altered PS II responses might explain increased susceptibility to photoinhibition.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
increased susceptibility to photoinhibitione0
Qualifier
Such changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Such changes might be responsible for the increased susceptibility to photoinhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.