Paper · 2014 · Agriculture

Evaluation of Spring Wheat (20 Varieties) Adaptation to Soil Drought during Seedlings Growth Stage

Jolanta Biesaga-Kościelniak; Agnieszka Ostrowska; Maria Filek; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of soil drought (10 days) on the growth of plants, the accumulation of water and leakage of electrolytes, gas exchange, the contents of chl a + b and carotenoids in leaves and photochemical activity of photosystem II was studied at the seedling stage by transient fluorescent analysis in 20 of the popular varieties of polish spring wheat. Drought caused a particularly strong reduction in vigor of growth of seedlings, net photosynthesis rate and triggered an increase in electrolyte leakage from the leaves. Certain varieties during the drought demonstrated relatively intense CO2 assimilation at low water loss through transpiration. The varieties tested were significantly different in terms of tolerance to drought of the processes of gas exchange and seedlings development. Photochemical processes in PSII showed high tolerance to drought and at the same time low differentiation among varieties. The results obtained suggested that tolerance of growth parameters to drought and CO2 assimilation at the seedling stage may alleviate consequent depression of final yield of the grain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought strongly reduced wheat seedling growth vigor.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
vigor of growth of seedlingse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused a particularly strong reduction in vigor of growth of seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought strongly reduced net photosynthesis.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
net photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused a particularly strong reduction in vigor of growth of seedlings, net photosynthesis rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased electrolyte leakage from leaves.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
electrolyte leakage from the leavese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused a particularly strong reduction in vigor of growth of seedlings, net photosynthesis rate and triggered an increase in electrolyte leakage from the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some varieties maintained relatively intense CO2 assimilation with low transpiration water loss under drought.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Certain varietiese0
Outcome
relatively intense CO2 assimilation at low water loss through transpiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Certain varieties during the drought demonstrated relatively intense CO2 assimilation at low water loss through transpiration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties differed significantly in drought tolerance of gas exchange and seedling development.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
varieties testede0
Outcome
tolerance to drought of the processes of gas exchange and seedlings developmente0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The varieties tested were significantly different in terms of tolerance to drought of the processes of gas exchange and seedlings development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSII photochemical processes were highly drought tolerant with little variety differentiation.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Photochemical processes in PSIIe0
Direction
high tolerancee0
Qualifier
low differentiation among varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photochemical processes in PSII showed high tolerance to drought and at the same time low differentiation among varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerance of growth and CO2 assimilation at seedling stage may lessen final grain yield depression.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Outcome
depression of final yield of the graine0
Direction
alleviatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tolerance of growth parameters to drought and CO2 assimilation at the seedling stage may alleviate consequent depression of final yield of the grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 18 positive, 110 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.