Paper · 1988 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Salinity effects on annual bedding plants in a peat‐perlite medium and solution culture

Zong T. Huang; Douglas A. Cox

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Annual vinca (Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don ‘Pink Carpet'), geranium (Pelargonium x hortorum L. H. Bailey ‘Jackpot'), and marigold (Tagetes erecta L. ‘First Lady') were grown in a sphagnum peat moss and perlite medium. Plants were irrigated with solutions of different salinity by the addition of 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 g/1 of a NaCl and CaCl2 mixture resulting in solution electrical conductivity (EC) values of about 1.3, 3.0, 4.5, 7.9, and 13.9 ds/m, respectively. In another experiment marigold and geranium were grown in solution culture containing the same salt mixture at 0.0, 1.0, 4.0, and 8.0 g/1 with EC values of 1.4, 3.0, 7.4, and 12.5 ds/m, respectively. All species showed some salinity tolerance up to 2.0 g/1 in peat‐perlite and 1.0 g/1 in solution culture as growth reductions were below 10% and no foliar injury occurred. Foliar injury occurred on marigold and geranium, but not annual vinca, at 4.0 and 8.0 g/1 in both growing media. On a concentration basis, recently mature leaves sampled from marigold grown in peat‐perlite contained more chloride (Cl) but less sodium (Na) than geranium and annual vinca. However results of the solution culture experiment showed that, with the exception of 1.0 g/1 treatment, geranium and marigold plants absorbed the same amount of Cl and Na when content was expressed on a mg/g dry weight basis. The low Na concentration in marigold leaves was a reflection of restricted translocation of Na from the roots to the shoots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

annual vinca showed below 10% growth reduction and no foliar injury up to the stated salinity levels.

Taxon
annual vincae1
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
growth reductionse0
Direction
belowe0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
2.0 g/1 in peat‐perlite and 1.0 g/1 in solution culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All species showed some salinity tolerance up to 2.0 g/1 in peat‐perlite and 1.0 g/1 in solution culture as growth reductions were below 10% and no foliar injury occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“Annual vinca (Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don ‘Pink Carpet'), geranium (Pelargonium x hortorum L. H. Bailey ‘Jackpot'), and marigold (Tagetes erecta L. ‘First Lady') were grown in a sphagnum peat moss and perlite medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

geranium showed below 10% growth reduction and no foliar injury up to the stated salinity levels.

Taxon
geraniumGeraniume1
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
growth reductionse0
Direction
belowe0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
2.0 g/1 in peat‐perlite and 1.0 g/1 in solution culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Geranium
Geranium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All species showed some salinity tolerance up to 2.0 g/1 in peat‐perlite and 1.0 g/1 in solution culture as growth reductions were below 10% and no foliar injury occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“Annual vinca (Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don ‘Pink Carpet'), geranium (Pelargonium x hortorum L. H. Bailey ‘Jackpot'), and marigold (Tagetes erecta L. ‘First Lady') were grown in a sphagnum peat moss and perlite medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

marigold showed below 10% growth reduction and no foliar injury up to the stated salinity levels.

Taxon
marigolde1
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
growth reductionse0
Direction
belowe0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
2.0 g/1 in peat‐perlite and 1.0 g/1 in solution culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All species showed some salinity tolerance up to 2.0 g/1 in peat‐perlite and 1.0 g/1 in solution culture as growth reductions were below 10% and no foliar injury occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“Annual vinca (Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don ‘Pink Carpet'), geranium (Pelargonium x hortorum L. H. Bailey ‘Jackpot'), and marigold (Tagetes erecta L. ‘First Lady') were grown in a sphagnum peat moss and perlite medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

annual vincahad no foliar injury at 4.0 and 8.0 g/1.

Taxon
annual vincae0
Treatment
4.0 and 8.0 g/1e0
Outcome
not annual vincae0
Setting
both growing mediae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar injury occurred on marigold and geranium, but not annual vinca, at 4.0 and 8.0 g/1 in both growing media.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–968 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

geranium had foliar injury at 4.0 and 8.0 g/1.

Taxon
geraniumGeraniume0
Treatment
4.0 and 8.0 g/1e0
Outcome
Foliar injurye0
Setting
both growing mediae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Geranium
Geranium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar injury occurred on marigold and geranium, but not annual vinca, at 4.0 and 8.0 g/1 in both growing media.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–968 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

marigold had foliar injury at 4.0 and 8.0 g/1.

Taxon
marigolde0
Treatment
4.0 and 8.0 g/1e0
Outcome
Foliar injurye0
Setting
both growing mediae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar injury occurred on marigold and geranium, but not annual vinca, at 4.0 and 8.0 g/1 in both growing media.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–968 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marigold leaves contained more chloride (Cl) than geranium and annual vinca leaves in peat-perlite.

Taxon
marigolde0
Organ / stage
recently mature leavese0
Outcome
chloride (Cl)e0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
geranium and annual vincae0
Setting
peat‐perlitee0

Verbatim

e0

“On a concentration basis, recently mature leaves sampled from marigold grown in peat‐perlite contained more chloride (Cl) but less sodium (Na) than geranium and annual vinca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marigold leaves contained less sodium (Na) than geranium and annual vinca leaves in peat-perlite.

Taxon
marigolde0
Organ / stage
recently mature leavese0
Outcome
sodium (Na)e0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
geranium and annual vincae0
Setting
peat‐perlitee0

Verbatim

e0

“On a concentration basis, recently mature leaves sampled from marigold grown in peat‐perlite contained more chloride (Cl) but less sodium (Na) than geranium and annual vinca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

geranium absorbed the same amounts of chlorine and sodium as the other species in solution culture, except at 1.0 g/1.

Taxon
geraniumGeraniume0
Outcome
Cl and Nae0
Direction
same amounte0
Comparator
geranium and marigold plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Geranium
Geranium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“geranium and marigold plants absorbed the same amount of Cl and Na when content was expressed on a mg/g dry weight basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

marigold absorbed the same amounts of chlorine and sodium as the other species in solution culture, except at 1.0 g/1.

Taxon
marigolde0
Outcome
Cl and Nae0
Direction
same amounte0
Comparator
geranium and marigold plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“geranium and marigold plants absorbed the same amount of Cl and Na when content was expressed on a mg/g dry weight basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1369 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Restricted root-to-shoot sodium translocation explained low sodium concentration in marigold leaves.

Taxon
marigolde0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
low Na concentration in marigold leavese0
Qualifier
restricted translocation of Na from the roots to the shootse0

Verbatim

e0

“The low Na concentration in marigold leaves was a reflection of restricted translocation of Na from the roots to the shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1495 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Tagetes (marigolds)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · growth · GeraniumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.