Abstract
Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars were treated with dicamba at concentrations of 0 to 200 mg·liter -1 during 3 years. Although the response varied with cultivar, dose, and year, dicamba always delayed fruit abscission. At similar concentrations, dicamba usually reduced fruit drop more than NAA, but less than fenoprop. Dicamba at 10 mg·liter -1 effectively delayed drop of `Delicious', whereas 20 to 30 mg·liter -1 was required for `Red Yorking', `Rome', `Winesap', and `Stayman'. Dicamba did not influence flesh firmness, soluble solids content, water core, or starch content at harvest or after storage. Chemical names used: naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA); 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid (fenoprop); 3,6dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid (dicamba).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba delayed apple fruit abscission across cultivars, doses and years.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- dicambae0
- Outcome
- fruit abscissione0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Although the response varied with cultivar, dose, and year, dicamba always delayed fruit abscission.”
e1“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars were treated with dicamba”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba usually reduced fruit drop more than NAA at similar concentrations.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- dicambae0
- Outcome
- fruit drope0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- At similar concentrationse0
- Comparator
- NAAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At similar concentrations, dicamba usually reduced fruit drop more than NAA”
e1“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba usually reduced fruit drop less than fenoprop at similar concentrations.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- dicambae0
- Outcome
- fruit drope0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Qualifier
- At similar concentrationse0
- Comparator
- fenoprope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At similar concentrations, dicamba usually reduced fruit drop more than NAA, but less than fenoprop.”
e1“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba at 10 mg·liter -1 delayed fruit drop of Delicious.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Deliciouse0
- Treatment
- Dicamba at 10 mg·liter -1e0
- Outcome
- drope0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dicamba at 10 mg·liter -1 effectively delayed drop of `Delicious'”
e1“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba at 20 to 30 mg·liter -1 was required to delay drop of Red Yorking.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae2
- Material
- Red Yorkinge0
- Treatment
- Dicambae1
- Outcome
- drope1
- Direction
- delayede1
- Value
- 20 to 30 mg·liter -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“20 to 30 mg·liter -1 was required for `Red Yorking'”
e1“Dicamba at 10 mg·liter -1 effectively delayed drop”
e2“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba at 20 to 30 mg·liter -1 was required to delay drop of Rome.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae2
- Material
- Romee0
- Treatment
- Dicambae1
- Outcome
- drope1
- Direction
- delayede1
- Value
- 20 to 30 mg·liter -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“20 to 30 mg·liter -1 was required for `Red Yorking', `Rome'”
e1“Dicamba at 10 mg·liter -1 effectively delayed drop”
e2“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba at 20 to 30 mg·liter -1 was required to delay drop of Winesap.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae2
- Material
- Winesape0
- Treatment
- Dicambae1
- Outcome
- drope1
- Direction
- delayede1
- Value
- 20 to 30 mg·liter -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“20 to 30 mg·liter -1 was required for `Red Yorking', `Rome', `Winesap'”
e1“Dicamba at 10 mg·liter -1 effectively delayed drop”
e2“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba at 20 to 30 mg·liter -1 was required to delay drop of Stayman.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae2
- Material
- Staymane0
- Treatment
- Dicambae1
- Outcome
- drope1
- Direction
- delayede1
- Value
- 20 to 30 mg·liter -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“20 to 30 mg·liter -1 was required for `Red Yorking', `Rome', `Winesap', and `Stayman'”
e1“Dicamba at 10 mg·liter -1 effectively delayed drop”
e2“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba did not influence flesh firmness, soluble solids content, or water core at harvest or after storage.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- Dicambae0
- Outcome
- flesh firmness, soluble solids content, water coree0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
- Qualifier
- at harvest or after storagee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dicamba did not influence flesh firmness, soluble solids content, water core, or starch content at harvest or after storage.”
e1“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba did not influence starch content at harvest or after storage.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- Dicambae0
- Outcome
- starch contente0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
- Qualifier
- at harvest or after storagee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dicamba did not influence flesh firmness, soluble solids content, water core, or starch content at harvest or after storage.”
e1“Five apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
dicamba · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.