Paper · 2000 · Annals of Botany

Dried Cryopreserved Somatic Embryos of Two Picea Species Provide Suitable Material for Direct Plantlet Regeneration and Germplasm Storage

C Bomal

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
37
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop a cryopreservation method for long-term storage of mature somatic embryos of Picea spp. The effects of drying rate, embryo water content prior to cryopreservation, thawing rate, and rehydration on survival of cryopreserved somatic embryos were investigated. Emphasis was placed on the capacity of cryopreserved somatic embryos to germinate and regenerate plantlets directly, or to reinduce embryogenic tissue for new embryo production. Firstly, a slow drying rate at 97 or 88% relative humidity (RH) was needed to achieve high germination (96.7–100%) and high plantlet conversion rates (26.7–46.7%) (not different from controls). Secondly, somatic embryos had to reach a water content of 0.23 g H 2 O g −1 d.wt (48 h of desiccation at 97% RH) before immersion in liquid nitrogen to germinate at high frequency (93.8%). Thawing techniques had no effect on embryo survival. Dried and cryopreserved somatic embryos of Picea can also be used to reinduce embryogenic tissue and start new embryo production. Best reinduction frequency (66.7%) was obtained from cryopreserved embryos dried at 97% RH and rehydrated at 100% RH for 12 h prior to reinduction. No difference in embryo production was noticed between the parent line (1st embryogenic cycle) and the sub-lines (2nd embryogenic cycle). Second generation embryos germinated and regenerated into plantlets at rates similar to controls. The optimal cryopreservation method was successfully applied to several P. mariana and P. glauca genotypes. Copyright 2000 Annals of Botany Company

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow drying at 97 or 88% RH produced 96.7–100% germination.

Taxon
Picea spp.Piceae1
Treatment
a slow drying rate at 97 or 88% relative humidity (RH)e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
highe0
Value
96.7–100%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a slow drying rate at 97 or 88% relative humidity (RH) was needed to achieve high germination (96.7–100%) and high plantlet conversion rates (26.7–46.7%) (not different from controls).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“Picea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow drying at 97 or 88% RH produced 26.7–46.7% plantlet conversion.

Taxon
Picea spp.Piceae1
Treatment
a slow drying rate at 97 or 88% relative humidity (RH)e0
Outcome
plantlet conversion ratese0
Direction
highe0
Value
26.7–46.7%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a slow drying rate at 97 or 88% relative humidity (RH) was needed to achieve high germination (96.7–100%) and high plantlet conversion rates (26.7–46.7%) (not different from controls).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“Picea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryos dried to 0.23 g H 2 O g −1 d.wt before freezing germinated at 93.8%.

Taxon
Picea spp.Piceae1
Treatment
48 h of desiccation at 97% RHe0
Outcome
germinatee0
Direction
highe0
Value
93.8%e0
Qualifier
water content of 0.23 g H 2 O g −1 d.wte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“somatic embryos had to reach a water content of 0.23 g H 2 O g −1 d.wt (48 h of desiccation at 97% RH) before immersion in liquid nitrogen to germinate at high frequency (93.8%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“Picea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thawing technique did not affect embryo survival.

Taxon
Picea spp.Piceae1
Treatment
Thawing techniquese0
Outcome
embryo survivale0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thawing techniques had no effect on embryo survival.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“Picea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried cryopreserved Picea embryos could reinduce embryogenic tissue.

Taxon
PiceaPiceae0
Treatment
Dried and cryopreservede0
Outcome
reinduce embryogenic tissuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dried and cryopreserved somatic embryos of Picea can also be used to reinduce embryogenic tissue and start new embryo production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1036 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried cryopreserved Picea embryos could start new embryo production.

Taxon
PiceaPiceae0
Treatment
Dried and cryopreservede0
Outcome
start new embryo productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dried and cryopreserved somatic embryos of Picea can also be used to reinduce embryogenic tissue and start new embryo production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying at 97% RH and rehydration at 100% RH for 12 h gave 66.7% reinduction.

Taxon
Picea spp.Piceae1
Treatment
dried at 97% RH and rehydrated at 100% RH for 12 he0
Outcome
reinduction frequencye0
Direction
Beste0
Value
66.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Best reinduction frequency (66.7%) was obtained from cryopreserved embryos dried at 97% RH and rehydrated at 100% RH for 12 h prior to reinduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1184 · show in text ↑
e1

“Picea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryo production did not differ between parent line and sublines.

Taxon
Picea spp.Piceae1
Material
parent linee0
Outcome
embryo productione0
Direction
No differencee0
Comparator
sub-linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No difference in embryo production was noticed between the parent line (1st embryogenic cycle) and the sub-lines (2nd embryogenic cycle).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1322 · show in text ↑
e1

“Picea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second generation embryos germinated at rates similar to controls.

Taxon
Picea spp.Piceae1
Organ / stage
Second generation embryose0
Outcome
germinatede0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Second generation embryos germinated and regenerated into plantlets at rates similar to controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“Picea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second generation embryos regenerated into plantlets at rates similar to controls.

Taxon
Picea spp.Piceae1
Organ / stage
Second generation embryose0
Outcome
regenerated into plantletse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Second generation embryos germinated and regenerated into plantlets at rates similar to controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“Picea spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–122 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal cryopreservation method worked across several P. mariana genotypes.

Taxon
P. marianaPicea marianae0
Material
P. marianae0
Outcome
successfully appliede0
Value
severale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea mariana
Picea mariana · TaxonLBM1948 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal cryopreservation method was successfully applied to several P. mariana and P. glauca genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1528 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal cryopreservation method worked across several P. glauca genotypes.

Taxon
P. glaucaPicea glaucae0
Material
P. glaucae0
Outcome
successfully appliede0
Value
severale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea glauca
Picea glauca · Taxondmcdevit · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal cryopreservation method was successfully applied to several P. mariana and P. glauca genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1528 · show in text ↑