Paper · 2008 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Economizing the use of nitrogen fertilizer in wheat production through enriched compost

Rizwan Ahmad; Muhammad Naveed; Muhammad Aslam; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
71
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Manipulation of organic wastes and their composts as a source of organic matter (OM) and nutrients is imperative for sustainable agriculture. Further, the fortification of composts with chemical fertilizer enhances agronomic effectiveness of both by reducing the amount of fertilizer and improving the quality of compost. The present study aimed to explore the potential of organic and chemical nutrient sources with their optimal application and integration for sustainable wheat production. Accordingly, waste fruits and vegetables were collected, dried, ground and processed in a composting vessel. During the enriched composting, waste material (300 kg) was fortified with 30 kg N, i.e. 25% of the standard rate (120 kg N ha −1 ) of N fertilizer. Treatments for both greenhouse and field experiments using wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) included: control (without any compost or N fertilizer), compost (non-enriched), fertilizer N 120 (120 kg N ha −1 ), nitrogen-enriched compost (NEC), NEC+N 30 (30 kg N ha −1 ) and NEC+N 60 (60 kg N ha −1 ). Application rate of composts (non-enriched or enriched) was 300 kg ha −1 in the respective treatments. Phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were applied at 90 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 and 60 kg K 2 O ha −1 , respectively in all treatments. The crop was grown to maturity, and data on wheat growth and yield attributes were recorded. Application of NEC significantly improved the growth, yield and N, P and K contents of wheat compared with compost and control treatments. The performance of NEC+N 60 was statistically similar to that of fertilizer N 120. Economic analysis also revealed the superiority of NEC+N 60 over other treatments in terms of net return and relative increase in income; however, the value/cost ratio was highest with NEC alone. For effective and economical use of N fertilizer, it is suggested to integrate N fertilizer at reduced rates with NEC. Through enriched compost, application rates can be decreased from tonnes to kilograms per hectare, and dependence on chemical fertilizer can be reduced to a certain extent. So the approach is farmer friendly as it lowers compost application rates, and is economically acceptable as it saves N fertilizer. It is also environmentally sustainable due the recycling of organic waste and possible reduction of N losses to the environment. Thus, the study has wide application in the global environment and fertilizer market.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-enriched compost improved wheat growth and yield compared with compost and control.

Treatment
NECe0
Outcome
growth, yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
compost and control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NEC significantly improved the growth, yield and N, P and K contents of wheat compared with compost and control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-enriched compost improved wheat N, P and K contents compared with compost and control.

Treatment
NECe0
Outcome
N, P and K contentse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
compost and control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NEC significantly improved the growth, yield and N, P and K contents of wheat compared with compost and control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NEC+N 60 performed similarly to fertilizer N 120.

Treatment
NEC+N 60e0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
fertilizer N 120e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of NEC+N 60 was statistically similar to that of fertilizer N 120.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NEC+N 60 had superior net return and relative increase in income over other treatments.

Treatment
NEC+N 60e0
Outcome
net return and relative increase in incomee0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Economic analysis also revealed the superiority of NEC+N 60 over other treatments in terms of net return and relative increase in income; however, the value/cost ratio was highest with NEC alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1798 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NEC alone had the highest value/cost ratio.

Treatment
NEC alonee0
Outcome
value/cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the value/cost ratio was highest with NEC alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest integrating reduced nitrogen fertilizer rates with enriched compost for effective and economical fertilizer use.

Outcome
integrate N fertilizer at reduced rates with NECe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For effective and economical use of N fertilizer, it is suggested to integrate N fertilizer at reduced rates with NEC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–1917 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.