Paper · 2011 · http://jast.modares.ac.ir/pdf_4750_f9e7aa665613608b3d69f8d8e97c32f6.html

Water Use Efficiency of Four Dryland Wheat Cultivars under Different Levels of Nitrogen Fertilization

H. Miranzadeh; Y. Emam; Petter Pilesjö; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It is suggested that cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with regulated growth and development would be able to produce higher yields under water-limited conditions, which is crucial in future food production. Water use efficiency (WUE) is worthy of exploration in this regard. In this study, the effects of nitrogen fertilizer levels (0, 40 and 80 kg Nha-1) and a plant growth retardant (Chlormequat Chloride = CCC) on WUE of four dryland wheat cultivars (Agosta, Nicknejad, Azar-2 and Fin-15) were examined in a field experiment during 2006-07 and 2007-08 growing seasons at College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran. The results showed that there existed significant differences between cultivars for grain yield, biomass and WUE. In the first season, the highest grain yield and biomass production (192.4 and 431.2 gm-2, respectively) were obtained from Nicknejad cultivar, CCC application and using 80 kg Nha-1, and in the second season, from Azar-2 cultivar (121.5 and 333.5 gm-2, respectively). CCC and nitrogen had significant effects on photosynthesis rate and WUE in both seasons. Interaction of CCC and 80 kg Nha-1 on WUE were significant in both seasons (1.24 and 2.72 gm-2mm-1, respectively). It is suggested that interactive application of CCC and nitrogen fertilizer could have beneficial effects on wheat grain yield under similar agro-climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in grain yield, biomass and WUE.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
grain yield, biomass and WUEe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences between cultivars for grain yield, biomass and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicknejad with CCC and 80 kg Nha-1 had the highest first-season grain yield, 192.4 gm-2.

Material
Nicknejad cultivare0
Treatment
CCC application and using 80 kg Nha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
192.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first season, the highest grain yield and biomass production (192.4 and 431.2 gm-2, respectively) were obtained from Nicknejad cultivar, CCC application and using 80 kg Nha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicknejad with CCC and 80 kg Nha-1 had the highest first-season biomass, 431.2 gm-2.

Material
Nicknejad cultivare0
Treatment
CCC application and using 80 kg Nha-1e0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
431.2 gm-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first season, the highest grain yield and biomass production (192.4 and 431.2 gm-2, respectively) were obtained from Nicknejad cultivar, CCC application and using 80 kg Nha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azar-2 had the highest second-season grain yield, 121.5 gm-2.

Material
Azar-2 cultivare0
Value
121.5e0

Not reportedOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the second season, from Azar-2 cultivar (121.5 and 333.5 gm-2, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azar-2 had the highest second-season biomass, 333.5 gm-2.

Material
Azar-2 cultivare0
Value
333.5 gm-2e0

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the second season, from Azar-2 cultivar (121.5 and 333.5 gm-2, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC and nitrogen significantly affected photosynthesis rate in both seasons.

Treatment
CCC and nitrogene0
Outcome
photosynthesis ratee0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CCC and nitrogen had significant effects on photosynthesis rate and WUE in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC and nitrogen significantly affected WUE in both seasons.

Treatment
CCC and nitrogene0
Outcome
WUEe0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CCC and nitrogen had significant effects on photosynthesis rate and WUE in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC and 80 kg Nha-1 interacted significantly for WUE in both seasons, with values of 1.24 and 2.72 gm-2mm-1.

Treatment
CCC and 80 kg Nha-1e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Value
1.24 and 2.72 gm-2mm-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of CCC and 80 kg Nha-1 on WUE were significant in both seasons (1.24 and 2.72 gm-2mm-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.