Paper · 1970 · Australian Journal of Biological Sciences

Transpiration and The Waxy Bloom in Brassica Oleracea L.

DW Denna

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
49
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The stomatal and cuticular transpiration rates and quantity of wax per unit area of leaf surface were determined for seven glaucous and non-glaucous sibling lines of B. oleracea. There were no statistically significant differences in the stomatal transpiration rates of the glaucous and non-glaucous lines, but there were highly statistically significant differences between the two classes of lines in terms of cuticular transpiration. Rubbing the surfaces of the leaves to remove lightly adhering wax deposits, such as the waxy bloom, significantly increased the cuticular but not the stomatal transpiration rates of both glaucous and non-glaucous plants. There was no appreciable correlation between the quantity of wax per unit area of leaf surface and the loss of water through cuticular transpiration among either the glaucous or nonglaucous lines. It was concluded that the function of cuticular waxes in limiting cuticular transpiration is a product of the architecture of the deposits and the quantity of wax per unit area of leaf surface.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal transpiration rates did not differ significantly between glaucous and non-glaucous lines.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae0
Material
glaucous and non-glaucous linese1
Outcome
stomatal transpiration ratese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sibling lines of B. oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were no statistically significant differences in the stomatal transpiration rates of the glaucous and non-glaucous lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuticular transpiration differed highly significantly between glaucous and non-glaucous lines.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae0
Material
two classes of linese2
Outcome
cuticular transpiratione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sibling lines of B. oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–177 · show in text ↑
e2

“there were highly statistically significant differences between the two classes of lines in terms of cuticular transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubbing the leaves significantly increased cuticular transpiration in both glaucous and non-glaucous plants.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae0
Material
glaucous and non-glaucous plantse3
Treatment
Rubbing the surfaces of the leaves to remove lightly adhering wax depositse3
Outcome
cuticulare3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sibling lines of B. oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rubbing the surfaces of the leaves to remove lightly adhering wax deposits, such as the waxy bloom, significantly increased the cuticular but not the stomatal transpiration rates of both glaucous and non-glaucous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubbing the leaves did not significantly change stomatal transpiration rates in glaucous or non-glaucous plants.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae0
Material
glaucous and non-glaucous plantse3
Treatment
Rubbing the surfaces of the leaves to remove lightly adhering wax depositse3
Outcome
stomatal transpiration ratese3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sibling lines of B. oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rubbing the surfaces of the leaves to remove lightly adhering wax deposits, such as the waxy bloom, significantly increased the cuticular but not the stomatal transpiration rates of both glaucous and non-glaucous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–656 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No appreciable correlation was found between leaf wax quantity and cuticular water loss in glaucous or non-glaucous lines.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae0
Treatment
quantity of wax per unit area of leaf surfacee4
Outcome
loss of water through cuticular transpiratione4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sibling lines of B. oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–177 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was no appreciable correlation between the quantity of wax per unit area of leaf surface and the loss of water through cuticular transpiration among either the glaucous or nonglaucous lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–853 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuticular wax limits cuticular transpiration through the architecture of the deposits and the wax quantity per unit leaf area.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae0
Outcome
limiting cuticular transpiratione5
Qualifier
architecture of the deposits and the quantity of wax per unit area of leaf surfacee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sibling lines of B. oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–177 · show in text ↑
e5

“the function of cuticular waxes in limiting cuticular transpiration is a product of the architecture of the deposits and the quantity of wax per unit area of leaf surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1047 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: gas exchange · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.