Paper · 2013 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) on canola (Brassica napus L.) vegetative and reproductive growth under controlled conditions

Wonder Ngezimana; Gert Andries Agenbag

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Canola is becoming a major source of vegetable oil with increasing demand in South Africa, yet low yields are presently experienced in production areas of the Western Cape Province. Crop response to fertiliser applications in field trials under rainfed conditions are often poor, because of a large number of growth factors that may limit growth and yield. To determine how canola responds to nitrogen (N) with no (low) and high sulphur (S) rates under ideal conditions in a controlled environment, a 5 x 2 factorial experiment, with N (0, 40, 80, 120 and 160 kg ha -1 ) and S (0 and 40 kg ha -1 ) fertilisation rates, was conducted. Plants were irrigated with a nutrient solution which contained all nutrients, but with very low N and S contents. Nitrogen application significantly increased leaf area, hence dry mass accumulation and ultimately flowering and pod formation, but high N and S application levels during early growth stages may have a negative effect on growth. Significant interaction between N and S were shown, however the positive effects of S were more pronounced in the reproductive phases. In this experiment, conducted under controlled temperature and watering conditions, but short winter daylight lengths, yield components of canola as measured by the number of flowers and pods at 91 DAP tended to reach a peak at application rates of 120 kg N ha -1 and 40 kg S ha -1 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased canola leaf area

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
controlled environmente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen application significantly increased leaf area, hence dry mass accumulation and ultimately flowering and pod formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–874 · show in text ↑
e2

“under ideal conditions in a controlled environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased dry mass accumulation, flowering and pod formation in canola

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
dry mass accumulation and ultimately flowering and pod formatione1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen application significantly increased leaf area, hence dry mass accumulation and ultimately flowering and pod formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N and S application during early growth stages may reduce canola growth

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Organ / stage
early growth stagese3
Treatment
high N and S application levelse3
Outcome
growthe3
Qualifier
maye3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–69 · show in text ↑
e3

“high N and S application levels during early growth stages may have a negative effect on growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–975 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant interaction between N and S was shown for canola growth

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
N and Se4
Outcome
interaction between N and Se4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–69 · show in text ↑
e4

“Significant interaction between N and S were shown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Positive effects of S on canola were more pronounced in reproductive phases

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Organ / stage
reproductive phasese5
Treatment
Se5
Outcome
positive effectse5
Direction
more pronouncede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–69 · show in text ↑
e5

“the positive effects of S were more pronounced in the reproductive phases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola flower and pod number at 91 DAP tended to peak at 120 kg N ha -1 and 40 kg S ha -1

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
120 kg N ha -1 and 40 kg S ha -1e6
Outcome
number of flowers and pods at 91 DAPe6
Direction
reach a peake6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–69 · show in text ↑
e6

“yield components of canola as measured by the number of flowers and pods at 91 DAP tended to reach a peak at application rates of 120 kg N ha -1 and 40 kg S ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1393 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 65 positive, 17 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

239 papers: 198 positive, 41 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

235 papers more in this group

See all 239 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.