Paper · 2013 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Precision nitrogen management using chlorophyll meter for Improving Growth, Productivity and N Use Efficiency of Rice in Subtropical Climate

Mainak Ghosh; Dillip Kumar Swain; Madan Kumar Jha; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

N management must be based on crop demand and supply capacity of the soil. A field experiment was conducted to analyze the effect of chlorophyll meter (SPAD meter) based N management on growth, productivity and agronomic N use efficiency of rice (cv. IR 36) in lateritic soil of India during the wet season of 2010 and 2011. The Experiment contained twelve N management treatments such as farmers’ fertilizer practice, one fixed time N management (FTNM), nine treatments of real time N management (RTNM), and one control. The RTNM is the combination of three SPAD threshold (SPAD: 34, 36 and 38) and three N levels (15, 25 and 35 kg ha-1) for top dressing when the SPAD value of rice leaf falls below the threshold. The grain yield of RTNM was in the range 93 to 105% as that of FTNM, but with lower N application rate. Among RTNM treatments, SPAD 36 with 35 and 25 kg N ha-1 top-dressing could save N fertilizer by 20 to 35% compared to FTNM without reducing grain yield. Agronomic N use efficiency can be increased at high yield level using SPAD meter based N management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Real-time nitrogen management yielded 93 to 105% of fixed-time management with less nitrogen applied.

Treatment
RTNMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
93 to 105%e0
Comparator
FTNMe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield of RTNM was in the range 93 to 105% as that of FTNM, but with lower N application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Real-time nitrogen management used less nitrogen than fixed-time management.

Treatment
RTNMe0
Outcome
N application ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
FTNMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield of RTNM was in the range 93 to 105% as that of FTNM, but with lower N application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD 36 with 35 kg N ha-1 top-dressing saved 20 to 35% nitrogen fertilizer versus fixed-time management without reducing grain yield.

Treatment
SPAD 36 with 35e0
Outcome
N fertilizere0
Direction
savee0
Value
20 to 35%e0
Comparator
FTNMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD 36 with 35 and 25 kg N ha-1 top-dressing could save N fertilizer by 20 to 35% compared to FTNM without reducing grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD 36 with 25 kg N ha-1 top-dressing saved 20 to 35% nitrogen fertilizer versus fixed-time management.

Treatment
25 kg N ha-1 top-dressinge0
Outcome
N fertilizere0
Direction
savee0
Value
20 to 35%e0
Comparator
FTNMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD 36 with 35 and 25 kg N ha-1 top-dressing could save N fertilizer by 20 to 35% compared to FTNM without reducing grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These SPAD 36 treatments did not reduce grain yield relative to fixed-time management.

Treatment
SPAD 36 with 35 and 25 kg N ha-1 top-dressinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
without reducinge0
Comparator
FTNMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD 36 with 35 and 25 kg N ha-1 top-dressing could save N fertilizer by 20 to 35% compared to FTNM without reducing grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD-meter nitrogen management can increase agronomic nitrogen use efficiency at high yield.

Treatment
SPAD meter based N managemente0
Outcome
Agronomic N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic N use efficiency can be increased at high yield level using SPAD meter based N management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–117 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.