Claim · model-written summary
These SPAD 36 treatments did not reduce grain yield relative to fixed-time management.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SPAD 36 with 35 and 25 kg N ha-1 top-dressinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- without reducinge0
- Comparator
- FTNMe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SPAD 36 with 35 and 25 kg N ha-1 top-dressing could save N fertilizer by 20 to 35% compared to FTNM without reducing grain yield”
t0“Rice”
Title
Mainak Ghosh; Dillip Kumar Swain; Madan Kumar Jha; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2013. doi:10.5539/jas.v5n2p253
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Real-time nitrogen management yielded 93 to 105% of fixed-time management with less nitrogen applied.
- Intervention effect Real-time nitrogen management used less nitrogen than fixed-time management.
- Intervention effect SPAD 36 with 35 kg N ha-1 top-dressing saved 20 to 35% nitrogen fertilizer versus fixed-time management without reducing grain yield.
- Intervention effect SPAD 36 with 25 kg N ha-1 top-dressing saved 20 to 35% nitrogen fertilizer versus fixed-time management.
- Observation SPAD-meter nitrogen management can increase agronomic nitrogen use efficiency at high yield.