Paper · 2012 · The Open Food Science Journal

Characterization of ‘Honeycrisp’ and ‘McIntosh’ Apple Juice Quality in Relation to Delayed Cooling Treatments

Jingfei Gao

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to examine the influence of delayed cooling on juice quality, seven and three days of delayed cooling were applied to 'Honeycrisp' and 'McIntosh' apples, respectively. After the delayed cooling treatment, apples were stored in refrigerated air (RA) and in three different controlled atmospheres (CA) for six months. Titratable acidity (TA) decreased over the storage period due to the delayed cooling treatment for both 'Honeycrisp' and 'McIntosh' apples. Lower TA was detected in RA-stored apples compared to CA-stored fruit. In addition, the lowest TA of the juice samples was detected when 'McIntosh' apples were stored in RA with no delayed cooling treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed cooling reduced titratable acidity during storage of Honeycrisp apples.

Material
'Honeycrisp'e0
Treatment
delayed cooling treatmente0
Outcome
Titratable acidity (TA)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Titratable acidity (TA) decreased over the storage period due to the delayed cooling treatment for both 'Honeycrisp' and 'McIntosh' apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed cooling reduced titratable acidity during storage of McIntosh apples.

Material
'McIntosh'e0
Treatment
delayed cooling treatmente0
Outcome
Titratable acidity (TA)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Titratable acidity (TA) decreased over the storage period due to the delayed cooling treatment for both 'Honeycrisp' and 'McIntosh' apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Refrigerated-air storage produced lower acidity than controlled atmosphere storage.

Treatment
RA-storede0
Outcome
TAe0
Direction
Lowere0
Comparator
CA-storede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower TA was detected in RA-stored apples compared to CA-stored fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

McIntosh apples stored in refrigerated air without delayed cooling had the lowest juice acidity.

Material
'McIntosh'e0
Treatment
stored in RA with no delayed cooling treatmente0
Outcome
TA of the juice samplese0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest TA of the juice samples was detected when 'McIntosh' apples were stored in RA with no delayed cooling treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–672 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.