Paper · 1951 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

American hybrid maize for silage in the south of England Part I. The yield and composition with special reference to plant population and nitrogenous fertilizer

M. E. Castle; A. S. Foot; S. J. Rowland

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For three consecutive years American hybrid maize was grown, under replicated experimental conditions, in the south of England. Each season, the influence of the spacing of the plants and the use of nitrogenous fertilizer on the yield and composition of the crop and of its separate portions of leaf, stem and cob was investigated. The growth of the maize, and especially its yield of dry matter, were influenced by the weather conditions during the season. The weight of fresh crop varied, with season and treatment, from 126 to 278 (averaging 209), and of dry matter from 20 to 70 (averaging 50) cwt./acre. Thinning below the established plant populations of up to 30,000 plants per acre regularly reduced these yields. Top-dressing with sulphate of ammonia increased them in 1947 and 1949, but decreased them in 1948. The yield of crude protein varied from 2.2 to 5.0, and of soluble carbohydrates from 12 to 46 cwt./acre. The top-dressing increased the protein content of all portions of the plant. The cob contributed, on a weight basis, 46% of the fresh crop, 49% of its dry matter, 54% of its crude protein and 54% of its soluble carbohydrates. Details are given of the chemical composition of the whole plant, and of its separate leaf, cob and stem, for each season and treatment. A later paper will deal with the making of silage from the maize crops and with the yield, composition and nutritive value of the silage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weather conditions influenced maize growth and dry matter yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
yield of dry mattere0
Setting
weather conditions during the seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of the maize, and especially its yield of dry matter, were influenced by the weather conditions during the season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–457 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh crop weight ranged from 126 to 278 cwt./acre.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
weight of fresh crope0
Value
126 to 278 (averaging 209)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight of fresh crop varied, with season and treatment, from 126 to 278 (averaging 209), and of dry matter from 20 to 70 (averaging 50) cwt./acre.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter weight ranged from 20 to 70 cwt./acre.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Value
20 to 70 (averaging 50) cwt./acree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weight of fresh crop varied, with season and treatment, from 126 to 278 (averaging 209), and of dry matter from 20 to 70 (averaging 50) cwt./acre.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning below established populations up to 30,000 plants per acre reduced yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Thinning below the established plant populations of up to 30,000 plants per acree0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
established plant populations of up to 30,000 plants per acree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thinning below the established plant populations of up to 30,000 plants per acre regularly reduced these yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate of ammonia top dressing increased yields in 1947 and 1949.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Top-dressing with sulphate of ammoniae0
Outcome
yieldt0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
1947 and 1949e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Top-dressing with sulphate of ammonia increased them in 1947 and 1949, but decreased them in 1948.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize for silage in the south of England Part I. The yield and composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate of ammonia top dressing decreased yields in 1948.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Top-dressing with sulphate of ammoniae0
Outcome
yieldt0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
1948e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Top-dressing with sulphate of ammonia increased them in 1947 and 1949, but decreased them in 1948.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize for silage in the south of England Part I. The yield and composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein yield varied from 2.2 to 5.0 cwt./acre.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
yield of crude proteine0
Value
2.2 to 5.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of crude protein varied from 2.2 to 5.0, and of soluble carbohydrates from 12 to 46 cwt./acre.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble carbohydrate yield varied from 12 to 46 cwt./acre.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
soluble carbohydratese0
Value
12 to 46 cwt./acree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of crude protein varied from 2.2 to 5.0, and of soluble carbohydrates from 12 to 46 cwt./acre.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top dressing increased protein content of leaf, stem, and cob.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
all portions of the plante0
Treatment
top-dressinge0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The top-dressing increased the protein content of all portions of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cob contributed 46% of fresh crop weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
cobe0
Outcome
fresh crope0
Value
46%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cob contributed, on a weight basis, 46% of the fresh crop, 49% of its dry matter, 54% of its crude protein and 54% of its soluble carbohydrates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cob contributed 49% of dry matter.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
cobe0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Value
49%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cob contributed, on a weight basis, 46% of the fresh crop, 49% of its dry matter, 54% of its crude protein and 54% of its soluble carbohydrates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cob contributed 54% of crude protein.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
cobe0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Value
54%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cob contributed, on a weight basis, 46% of the fresh crop, 49% of its dry matter, 54% of its crude protein and 54% of its soluble carbohydrates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cob contributed 54% of soluble carbohydrates.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
cobe0
Outcome
soluble carbohydratese0
Value
54%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cob contributed, on a weight basis, 46% of the fresh crop, 49% of its dry matter, 54% of its crude protein and 54% of its soluble carbohydrates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–21 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.