Paper · 2009 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Curative and Preventive Activity of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose-Lipid Edible Composite Coatings Containing Antifungal Food Additives to Control Citrus Postharvest Green and Blue Molds

Silvia A. Valencia-Chamorro; María B. Pérez-Gago; Miguel A. Del Río; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
77
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Edible composite coatings based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), lipid components (beeswax and shellac), and food preservatives with antifungal properties were evaluated in vivo on clementine mandarins cv. Clemenules, hybrid mandarins cv. Ortanique, and oranges cv. Valencia. Their curative and preventive activity against citrus postharvest green (GM) and blue molds (BM), caused by Penicillium digitatum (PD) or Penicillium italicum (PI), respectively, were determined. Fruits were artificially inoculated before or after the application of the coatings and incubated up to 7 days at 20 degrees C. Selected food preservatives included mineral salts, organic acid salts, parabens, and 2-deoxy-d-glucose. Inoculated but uncoated fruits were used as controls. For curative activity, HPMC-lipid edible composite coatings containing sodium benzoate (SB) were most effective in reducing the incidence and severity of GM on clementine mandarins cv. Clemenules (86 and 90%, respectively). On this cultivar, the reduction in GM incidence by the SB-based coating was twice that of potassium sorbate (PS)-based coating. On mandarins cv. Ortanique, PS- and SB-based coatings reduced the incidence of GM and BM by more than 40 and 21%, respectively. However, the HPMC-lipid coating containing a mixture of PS and sodium propionate (PS + SP) exhibited a synergistic effect in the reduction of the incidence of GM (78%) and BM (67%). Coatings with parabens modestly reduced disease incidence and severity. On oranges cv. Valencia, coatings with food preservatives better controlled BM than GM. Coatings containing SB + PS and SB + SP reduced the incidence and severity of BM by 85% and 95%, respectively. PS- and SB- based coatings controlled GM more effectively than coatings formulated with other food preservatives. In every cultivar, fruit coated before inoculation did not show any incidence or severity reduction of both GM and BM (preventive activity). In every test, the antifungal action of the coatings was fungistatic rather than fungicidal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB coating reduced green mold incidence on Clemenules by 86%.

Taxon
clementine mandarinse0
Material
Clemenulese0
Treatment
HPMC-lipid edible composite coatings containing sodium benzoate (SB)e0
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
86e0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Verbatim

e0

“HPMC-lipid edible composite coatings containing sodium benzoate (SB) were most effective in reducing the incidence and severity of GM on clementine mandarins cv. Clemenules (86 and 90%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB coating reduced green mold severity on Clemenules by 90%.

Taxon
clementine mandarinse0
Material
Clemenulese0
Treatment
HPMC-lipid edible composite coatings containing sodium benzoate (SB)e0
Outcome
severity of GMe0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“HPMC-lipid edible composite coatings containing sodium benzoate (SB) were most effective in reducing the incidence and severity of GM on clementine mandarins cv. Clemenules (86 and 90%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS and SB coatings reduced Ortanique green mold incidence by over 40%.

Taxon
mandarinse0
Material
Ortaniquee0
Treatment
PS- and SB-based coatingse0
Outcome
incidence of GMe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
more than 40 and 21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“On mandarins cv. Ortanique, PS- and SB-based coatings reduced the incidence of GM and BM by more than 40 and 21%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS and SB coatings reduced Ortanique blue mold incidence by over 21%.

Taxon
mandarinse0
Material
Ortaniquee0
Treatment
PS- and SB-based coatingse0
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“On mandarins cv. Ortanique, PS- and SB-based coatings reduced the incidence of GM and BM by more than 40 and 21%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS plus SP coating reduced Ortanique green mold incidence by 78%.

Taxon
mandarinst0
Treatment
HPMC-lipid coating containing a mixture of PS and sodium propionate (PS + SP)e0
Outcome
incidence of GMe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the HPMC-lipid coating containing a mixture of PS and sodium propionate (PS + SP) exhibited a synergistic effect in the reduction of the incidence of GM (78%) and BM (67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“On mandarins cv. Ortanique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS plus SP coating reduced Ortanique blue mold incidence by 67%.

Taxon
mandarinst0
Treatment
HPMC-lipid coating containing a mixture of PS and sodium propionate (PS + SP)e0
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the HPMC-lipid coating containing a mixture of PS and sodium propionate (PS + SP) exhibited a synergistic effect in the reduction of the incidence of GM (78%) and BM (67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“On mandarins cv. Ortanique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraben coatings modestly reduced disease incidence and severity.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
Coatings with parabense0
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings with parabens modestly reduced disease incidence and severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preservative coatings controlled blue mold better than green mold on Valencia oranges.

Taxon
orangese0
Material
Valenciae0
Treatment
coatings with food preservativese0
Outcome
controlled BMe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
GMe0

Verbatim

e0

“On oranges cv. Valencia, coatings with food preservatives better controlled BM than GM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB plus PS and SB plus SP coatings reduced Valencia blue mold incidence by 85%.

Taxon
orangest0
Treatment
Coatings containing SB + PS and SB + SPe0
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings containing SB + PS and SB + SP reduced the incidence and severity of BM by 85% and 95%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1699 · show in text ↑
t0

“On oranges cv. Valencia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SB plus PS and SB plus SP coatings reduced Valencia blue mold severity by 95%.

Taxon
orangest0
Treatment
Coatings containing SB + PS and SB + SPe0
Outcome
severity of BMe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings containing SB + PS and SB + SP reduced the incidence and severity of BM by 85% and 95%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1699 · show in text ↑
t0

“On oranges cv. Valencia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS and SB coatings controlled green mold more effectively than other preservatives.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
PS- and SB- based coatingse0
Outcome
controlled GMe0
Direction
more effectivelye0
Comparator
coatings formulated with other food preservativese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PS- and SB- based coatings controlled GM more effectively than coatings formulated with other food preservatives.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating before inoculation did not reduce either mold in any cultivar.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
fruit coated before inoculatione0
Outcome
incidence or severity reduction of both GM and BMe0
Direction
did not show anye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In every cultivar, fruit coated before inoculation did not show any incidence or severity reduction of both GM and BM (preventive activity).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating antifungal action was fungistatic.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Outcome
antifungal action of the coatings was fungistatic rather than fungicidale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In every test, the antifungal action of the coatings was fungistatic rather than fungicidal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1955–2047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–152 · show in text ↑

potassium sorbate · disease · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium sorbate · disease · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · disease · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · disease · CitrusPositive and negative results

23 papers: 11 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.