Paper · 2003 · Soil Use and Management

Improvements in soil quality and performance of mycorrhizal Cistus albidus L. seedlings resulting from addition of microbially treated sugar beet residue to a degraded semiarid Mediterranean soil

M.M. Alguacil; F. Caravaca; R. Azcón; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. A field experiment was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a combined treatment, involving addition of Aspergillus niger ‐treated sugar beet (SB) residue in the presence of rock phosphate and mycorrhizal inoculation of seedlings with Pisolithus tinctorius . The aim was to improve the physical, chemical, biochemical and biological properties of a degraded semiarid Mediterranean soil. Short‐term effects of such improvements on the establishment of Cistus albidus L. seedlings were evaluated. Eight months after planting, macronutrients (NPK), total carbohydrates, water‐soluble C, water‐soluble carbohydrates, microbial biomass C and enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, urease, protease, acid phosphatase and β‐glucosidase) measured in the rhizosphere soil of C. albidus were increased greatly by addition of fermented SB residue. Soil structural stability improved only with the fermented SB addition (about 79% higher in the amended soils than in the non‐amended soils). The mycorrhizal inoculation was the most effective treatment in improving the growth of C. albidus plants, but only slightly improved soil quality. Growth of inoculated plants was about 33% greater than plants grown in the amended soil and about 131% greater than control plants. The combined benefit of mycorrhizal inoculation of seedlings and addition of fermented SB residue to soil on plant growth was similar to that of the treatments applied individually.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermented sugar beet residue increased rhizosphere macronutrients, carbohydrates, and soluble carbon.

Taxon
C. albidusCistus albiduse0
Treatment
addition of fermented SB residuee0
Outcome
macronutrients (NPK), total carbohydrates, water‐soluble Ce0
Direction
increased greatlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“macronutrients (NPK), total carbohydrates, water‐soluble C, water‐soluble carbohydrates, microbial biomass C and enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, urease, protease, acid phosphatase and β‐glucosidase) measured in the rhizosphere soil of C. albidus were increased greatly by addition of fermented SB residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermented residue increased rhizosphere soluble carbohydrates and microbial biomass carbon.

Taxon
C. albidusCistus albiduse0
Treatment
addition of fermented SB residuee0
Outcome
water‐soluble carbohydrates, microbial biomass Ce0
Direction
increased greatlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“macronutrients (NPK), total carbohydrates, water‐soluble C, water‐soluble carbohydrates, microbial biomass C and enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, urease, protease, acid phosphatase and β‐glucosidase) measured in the rhizosphere soil of C. albidus were increased greatly by addition of fermented SB residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermented residue increased rhizosphere enzyme activities.

Taxon
C. albidusCistus albiduse0
Treatment
addition of fermented SB residuee0
Outcome
enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increased greatlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, urease, protease, acid phosphatase and β‐glucosidase) measured in the rhizosphere soil of C. albidus were increased greatly by addition of fermented SB residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermented residue improved soil structural stability by about 79% against unamended soil.

Taxon
Cistus albidus L.Cistus albidust0
Treatment
fermented SB additione0
Outcome
Soil structural stabilitye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
about 79%e0
Comparator
non‐amended soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil structural stability improved only with the fermented SB addition (about 79% higher in the amended soils than in the non‐amended soils).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cistus albidus L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation was the most effective treatment for Cistus growth.

Taxon
C. albidusCistus albiduse0
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Interactor
Pisolithus tinctoriusPisolithus tinctoriuse1symbiont
Outcome
growth of C. albidus plantse0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pisolithus tinctorius
Pisolithus tinctorius · InteractorPaul venter · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mycorrhizal inoculation was the most effective treatment in improving the growth of C. albidus plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1094 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pisolithus tinctorius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation only slightly improved soil quality.

Taxon
C. albidusCistus albiduse0
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
only slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizal inoculation was the most effective treatment in improving the growth of C. albidus plants, but only slightly improved soil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plant growth was about 33% greater than in amended soil.

Taxon
Cistus albidus L.Cistus albidust0
Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
about 33%e0
Comparator
plants grown in the amended soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of inoculated plants was about 33% greater than plants grown in the amended soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cistus albidus L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plant growth was about 131% greater than control plants.

Taxon
Cistus albidus L.Cistus albidust0
Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
about 131%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of inoculated plants was about 33% greater than plants grown in the amended soil and about 131% greater than control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cistus albidus L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining inoculation and residue addition gave growth benefit similar to either individually.

Taxon
Cistus albidus L.Cistus albidust0
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculation of seedlings and addition of fermented SB residuee0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
treatments applied individuallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined benefit of mycorrhizal inoculation of seedlings and addition of fermented SB residue to soil on plant growth was similar to that of the treatments applied individually.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cistus albidus L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Cistus albidusPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Cistus albidusResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.