Paper · 2013

Effect of immobilized rhizobacteria and organic amendment in bulk and rhizospheric soil of Cistus albidus L.

Carmen Mengual; María del Mar Alguacil; A. Roldán; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to assess the effectiveness of the immobilized microbial inoculant and the addition of organic olive residue. The microbial inoculant contained two rhizobacterial species identified as Azospirillum brasilense and Pantoea dispersa immobilized in a natural inert support. Bacterial population densities were 3.5 10 9 and 4.1 10 9 CFU g 1 of A. brasilense M3 and P. dispersa C3, respectively. The amendment used was the organic fraction extracted with KOH from composted “alperujo”. The raw material was collected from an olivemill and mixed with fresh cow bedding as bulking agent for composting. The inoculation of rhizobacteria and the addition of organic residue were employed for plant growth promotion of Cistus albidus L. and enhancement of soil physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties in a degraded semiarid Mediterranean area. One year after planting, the available phosphorus and potassium content in the amended soils was about 100 and 70% respectively higher than in the non-amended soil. Microbial inoculant and their interaction with organic residue increased the aggregate stability of the rhizosphere soil of C. albidus (by 12% with respect to control soil) while the organic residue alone not increased the aggregate stability of the rhizosphere of C. albidus. Microbial biomass C content and enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, urease, protease-BAA and alkaline phosphatase) of the rhizosphere of C. albidus were increased by microbial inoculant and organic residue interaction but not by microbial inoculation alone. The microbial inoculant and organic residue interaction were the most effective treatment for stimulating the roots dry weight of C. albidus (by 133% with respect to control plants) and microbial inoculant was the most effective treatment for increase the shoot dry weigh of plants (by 106% with respect to control plants). The combined treatment, involving microbial inoculant and addition of the organic residue directly into the soil, had additive effect on the root growth of C. albidus and chemical and biological quality of soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendment increased soil available phosphorus by about 100%.

Treatment
amended soilse0
Outcome
available phosphoruse0
Direction
highere0
Value
100e0
Comparator
non-amended soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“One year after planting, the available phosphorus and potassium content in the amended soils was about 100 and 70% respectively higher than in the non-amended soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendment increased soil available potassium by about 70%.

Treatment
amended soilse0
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
non-amended soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“One year after planting, the available phosphorus and potassium content in the amended soils was about 100 and 70% respectively higher than in the non-amended soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculant with organic residue increased rhizosphere aggregate stability by 12% relative to control.

Taxon
C. albidusCistus albiduse0
Treatment
Microbial inoculant and their interaction with organic residuee0
Outcome
aggregate stability of the rhizosphere soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
control soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial inoculant and their interaction with organic residue increased the aggregate stability of the rhizosphere soil of C. albidus (by 12% with respect to control soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic residue alone did not increase rhizosphere aggregate stability.

Taxon
C. albidusCistus albiduse0
Treatment
organic residue alonee0
Outcome
aggregate stability of the rhizospheree0
Direction
not increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the organic residue alone not increased the aggregate stability of the rhizosphere of C. albidus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculant and organic residue together increased rhizosphere microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activities.

Taxon
C. albidusCistus albiduse0
Treatment
microbial inoculant and organic residue interactione0
Outcome
Microbial biomass C content and enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial biomass C content and enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, urease, protease-BAA and alkaline phosphatase) of the rhizosphere of C. albidus were increased by microbial inoculant and organic residue interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation alone did not increase rhizosphere microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activities.

Treatment
microbial inoculation alonee0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“but not by microbial inoculation alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculant and residue increased Cistus root dry weight by 133% relative to control plants.

Taxon
C. albidusCistus albiduse0
Treatment
microbial inoculant and organic residue interactione0
Outcome
roots dry weighte0
Direction
stimulatinge0
Value
133%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The microbial inoculant and organic residue interaction were the most effective treatment for stimulating the roots dry weight of C. albidus (by 133% with respect to control plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculant increased shoot dry weight by 106% relative to control plants.

Treatment
microbial inoculante0
Outcome
shoot dry weighe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
106%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“microbial inoculant was the most effective treatment for increase the shoot dry weigh of plants (by 106% with respect to control plants).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1904 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Cistus albidusPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · soil: physics · Cistus albidusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.