Paper · 2026 · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

Phytochemical and Growth Patterns in Cistus albidus L.: Seasonal Impacts of Inoculation and Fertilization

Daniel Raus de Baviera; María Losada-Echeberría; Francisco-Javier Álvarez-Martínez; et al.

12
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seasonal dynamics and cultivation practices jointly regulate plant growth and secondary metabolism, yet their relative contributions and modes of interaction remain insufficiently resolved in many medicinal species. In this study, the effects of organic fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) inoculation on vegetative development, flowering behaviour, and phytochemical profiles of Cistus albidus L. across one complete vegetative cycle under controlled cultivation conditions have been examined. Four treatment groups (control, fertilization, inoculation, and combined fertilization + inoculation) were evaluated with respect to growth parameters, reproductive output, total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant capacity, and polyphenolic composition using UHPLC–MS. Across the vegetative cycle, seasonal progression emerged as the dominant regulator of both growth and metabolic traits, exerting strong control over leaf morphology, specific leaf area, flowering dynamics, and the temporal organisation of individual secondary metabolites. Fertilization primarily stabilised vegetative growth and reduced inter-individual variability, whereas AMF inoculation imposed consistent growth constraints, reduced reproductive output, and increased phenotypic and metabolic variability. Despite the absence of growth promotion typically associated with functional mycorrhizal symbiosis, inoculated plants exhibited elevated antioxidant capacity and increased concentrations of selected phenolic compounds, particularly during autumn. Phytochemical regulation was class-specific rather than uniform. Flavan-3-ols and flavonols displayed high seasonal plasticity and context-dependent responsiveness to inoculation, whereas phenolic acids, ellagitannins, and the secoiridoid glycoside were structured predominantly by harvest time and developmental stage. Total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were only weakly coupled, reflecting opposing seasonal trajectories among individual compounds and highlighting the importance of matrix-level organisation rather than bulk metabolite accumulation. These results indicate, cultivation practices influenced C. albidus primarily by modulating growth regulation and developmental allocation, while secondary metabolism was reorganised selectively within a strong seasonal framework. This integrative response provides a conceptual basis for interpreting growth–defence–signalling trade-offs in medicinal plants under controlled cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal progression was the dominant regulator of growth and metabolic traits of Cistus albidus.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Outcome
growth and metabolic traitse0
Qualifier
dominant regulatore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seasonal progression emerged as the dominant regulator of both growth and metabolic traits”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 812–902 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal progression strongly controlled leaf morphology, specific leaf area and flowering dynamics of Cistus albidus.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Outcome
leaf morphology, specific leaf area, flowering dynamicse0
Qualifier
strong controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“exerting strong control over leaf morphology, specific leaf area, flowering dynamics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization stabilised vegetative growth of Cistus albidus compared with control.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Treatment
Fertilizatione1
Outcome
vegetative growthe1
Direction
stabilisede1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization primarily stabilised vegetative growth and reduced inter-individual variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1150 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four treatment groups (control, fertilization, inoculation, and combined fertilization + inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization reduced inter-individual variability of Cistus albidus.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Treatment
Fertilizatione1
Outcome
inter-individual variabilitye1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization primarily stabilised vegetative growth and reduced inter-individual variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1150 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four treatment groups (control, fertilization, inoculation, and combined fertilization + inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation constrained growth of Cistus albidus compared with control.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione2
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal funguse3symbiont
Outcome
growthe2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e2

“AMF inoculation imposed consistent growth constraints, reduced reproductive output, and increased phenotypic and metabolic variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1294 · show in text ↑
e3

“arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–319 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four treatment groups (control, fertilization, inoculation, and combined fertilization + inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation reduced reproductive output of Cistus albidus compared with control.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione2
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal funguse3symbiont
Outcome
reproductive outpute2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e2

“AMF inoculation imposed consistent growth constraints, reduced reproductive output, and increased phenotypic and metabolic variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1294 · show in text ↑
e3

“arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–319 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four treatment groups (control, fertilization, inoculation, and combined fertilization + inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased phenotypic and metabolic variability of Cistus albidus compared with control.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione2
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal funguse3symbiont
Outcome
phenotypic and metabolic variabilitye2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e2

“AMF inoculation imposed consistent growth constraints, reduced reproductive output, and increased phenotypic and metabolic variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1294 · show in text ↑
e3

“arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–319 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four treatment groups (control, fertilization, inoculation, and combined fertilization + inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Cistus albidus plants had elevated antioxidant capacity, particularly during autumn.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Treatment
inoculated plantse4
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal funguse3symbiont
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye4
Direction
elevatede4
Qualifier
particularly during autumne4
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e3

“arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–319 · show in text ↑
e4

“inoculated plants exhibited elevated antioxidant capacity and increased concentrations of selected phenolic compounds, particularly during autumn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1541 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four treatment groups (control, fertilization, inoculation, and combined fertilization + inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Cistus albidus plants had increased concentrations of selected phenolic compounds, particularly during autumn.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Treatment
inoculated plantse4
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal funguse3symbiont
Outcome
concentrations of selected phenolic compoundse4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
particularly during autumne4
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e3

“arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–319 · show in text ↑
e4

“inoculated plants exhibited elevated antioxidant capacity and increased concentrations of selected phenolic compounds, particularly during autumn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1541 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four treatment groups (control, fertilization, inoculation, and combined fertilization + inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–614 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavan-3-ols and flavonols showed high seasonal plasticity and context-dependent responsiveness to inoculation in Cistus albidus.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Outcome
Flavan-3-ols and flavonolse5
Qualifier
high seasonal plasticity and context-dependent responsiveness to inoculatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e5

“Flavan-3-ols and flavonols displayed high seasonal plasticity and context-dependent responsiveness to inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1721 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic acids, ellagitannins and the secoiridoid glycoside were structured predominantly by harvest time and developmental stage.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Organ / stage
developmental stagee6
Outcome
phenolic acids, ellagitannins, and the secoiridoid glycosidee6
Qualifier
structured predominantly by harvest time and developmental stagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e6

“phenolic acids, ellagitannins, and the secoiridoid glycoside were structured predominantly by harvest time and developmental stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1861 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Cistus albidus were only weakly coupled.

Taxon
Cistus albidusCistus albidust0
Outcome
Total phenolic content and antioxidant capacitye7
Qualifier
only weakly couplede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cistus albidus
Cistus albidus · TaxonJúlio Reis · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cistus albidus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
e7

“Total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were only weakly coupled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–1935 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Cistus albidusPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Cistus albidusResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.