Paper · 2009 · Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research

Deep shade alters the acclimation response to moderate water stress in Quercus suber L.

M. D. Jimenez; M. Pardos; J. Puertolas; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The interactive effects of shade and drought on different morphological and physiological traits were addressed on Quercus suber L. seedlings. In our experiment, limited light treatment (1 per cent) represented the main factor constraining cork oak seedlings growth. Maximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) with light ≥15 per cent exhibited a midday fall, but under deep shade (1 per cent), Fv/Fm remained constant (<0.8 values) throughout the day. The quantum efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) was lower under moderate drought only in deeply shaded plants. The drought also interacted with light through the increase of the soluble sugar content at 100 per cent light, but not under shade. Under deep shade, soluble sugar content tended to be even lower under moderate drought conditions. The chlorophyll content was not the highest under deep shade as could be expected, while the efficiency of PSII was the lowest under deep shade. We concluded that cork oak can acclimate to moderate shade (15 per cent light), but deep shade impairs some of the physiological responses to cope with low light conditions under moderate drought stress. Plants growing under deep shade were very sensitive to moderate water stress in terms of loss of carbon fixation capacity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent light constrained cork oak seedling growth.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
limited light treatment (1 per cent)e0
Outcome
cork oak seedlings growthe0
Direction
constraininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“limited light treatment (1 per cent) represented the main factor constraining cork oak seedlings growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At light levels of at least 15 percent, Fv/Fm fell at midday.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
light ≥15 per cente0
Outcome
Maximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
falle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) with light ≥15 per cent exhibited a midday fall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under one percent light, Fv/Fm remained constant below 0.8 throughout the day.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
deep shade (1 per cent)e0
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
remained constante0
Value
<0.8 valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under deep shade (1 per cent), Fv/Fm remained constant (<0.8 values) throughout the day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drought lowered PSII quantum efficiency only under deep shade.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
moderate droughte0
Outcome
quantum efficiency of photosystem II (PSII)e0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
only in deeply shaded plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quantum efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) was lower under moderate drought only in deeply shaded plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased soluble sugar content under full light.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at 100 per cent lighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The drought also interacted with light through the increase of the soluble sugar content at 100 per cent light, but not under shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under shade, drought did not increase soluble sugar content.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
not under shadee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The drought also interacted with light through the increase of the soluble sugar content at 100 per cent light, but not under shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drought tended to lower soluble sugar content under deep shade.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
moderate drought conditionse0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
tended to bee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under deep shade, soluble sugar content tended to be even lower under moderate drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content was not highest under deep shade.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
deep shadee0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
not the higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content was not the highest under deep shade as could be expected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSII efficiency was lowest under deep shade.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
deep shadee0
Outcome
efficiency of PSIIe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the efficiency of PSII was the lowest under deep shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cork oak could acclimate to moderate shade at 15 percent light.

Taxon
cork oakQuercus subere0
Outcome
acclimate to moderate shade (15 per cent light)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cork oak can acclimate to moderate shade (15 per cent light)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep shade impaired physiological responses to moderate drought and reduced carbon fixation capacity.

Taxon
Quercus suber L.Quercus subert0
Treatment
deep shadee0
Outcome
carbon fixation capacitye0
Direction
losse0
Qualifier
moderate water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus suber
Quercus suber · TaxonJean-Pol GRANDMONT · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants growing under deep shade were very sensitive to moderate water stress in terms of loss of carbon fixation capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus suber L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Quercus suber (cork oak)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · growth · Quercus suber (cork oak)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Quercus suber (cork oak)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.