Paper · 2009 · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Organic and inorganic anions in Shiraz and Chardonnay grape berries and wine as affected by rootstock under saline conditions

H. GONG; D.H. BLACKMORE; R.R. WALKER

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background and Aims: Rootstocks influence the inorganic ion and organic acid composition of grapes of the scion variety. The aim was to investigate the impact of rootstocks on the inter-relationship of inorganic ions and organic acid anions in the skin and pulp of grapes and in resultant wine. Methods and Results: Vines were irrigated with water having electrical conductivities in the range 1.6–2.1 dS/m. Chloride, sodium, potassium, malic and tartaric acid concentrations were higher in almost all cases in skin than in pulp. Significant positive correlations existed between chloride and sodium concentrations in both pulp and skin. A significant negative linear regression existed between malic acid and both chloride and sodium concentrations in skin of Chardonnay berries. There were positive linear regressions in chloride concentration between berry (pulp and skin) and resultant wine chloride in both Chardonnay and Shiraz. Conclusion: The higher malic acid and lower chloride concentrations in skin of most grafted Chardonnay and Shiraz vines, and vice versa for own rooted vines, may indicate competition for similar transporter proteins involved in loading into skins. Alternatively, higher salt concentrations in skins may be associated with accelerated malic acid catabolism. Significance of the Study: Chloride-excluding rootstocks demonstrated advantages through reduced chloride (but not sodium) in pulp and skin of grape berries and in resultant wines. Where rootstocks reduced chloride concentrations in skin of grape berries, there is potential for higher malic acid in skin and in the resultant red wines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride, sodium, potassium, malic acid and tartaric acid were generally higher in skin than pulp.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
skine0
Outcome
Chloride, sodium, potassium, malic and tartaric acid concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
almost all casese0
Comparator
pulpe0

Verbatim

e0

“Chloride, sodium, potassium, malic and tartaric acid concentrations were higher in almost all cases in skin than in pulp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride and sodium concentrations were positively correlated in pulp and skin.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
pulp and skine0
Compound
sodiume0
Outcome
chloridee0
Direction
positivee0

Verbatim

e0

“Significant positive correlations existed between chloride and sodium concentrations in both pulp and skin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Malic acid was negatively related to chloride and sodium in Chardonnay skin.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Chardonnaye0
Organ / stage
skine0
Compound
chloride and sodiume0
Outcome
malic acide0
Direction
negativee0

Verbatim

e0

“A significant negative linear regression existed between malic acid and both chloride and sodium concentrations in skin of Chardonnay berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry and wine chloride concentrations were positively related in Chardonnay.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Chardonnaye0
Outcome
chloride concentratione0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
resultant wine chloridee0

Verbatim

e0

“There were positive linear regressions in chloride concentration between berry (pulp and skin) and resultant wine chloride in both Chardonnay and Shiraz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry and wine chloride concentrations were positively related in Shiraz.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Shiraze0
Outcome
chloride concentratione0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
resultant wine chloridee0

Verbatim

e0

“There were positive linear regressions in chloride concentration between berry (pulp and skin) and resultant wine chloride in both Chardonnay and Shiraz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines generally had higher skin malic acid than own-rooted vines.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
grafted Chardonnay and Shiraz vinese0
Organ / stage
skine0
Outcome
malic acide0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
own rooted vinese0

Verbatim

e0

“The higher malic acid and lower chloride concentrations in skin of most grafted Chardonnay and Shiraz vines, and vice versa for own rooted vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines generally had lower skin chloride than own-rooted vines.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
grafted Chardonnay and Shiraz vinese0
Organ / stage
skine0
Outcome
chloride concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
own rooted vinese0

Verbatim

e0

“The higher malic acid and lower chloride concentrations in skin of most grafted Chardonnay and Shiraz vines, and vice versa for own rooted vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride-excluding rootstocks reduced chloride in berries and wine.

Taxon
grapee0
Organ / stage
pulp and skin of grape berriese0
Treatment
Chloride-excluding rootstockse0
Outcome
chloridee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chloride-excluding rootstocks demonstrated advantages through reduced chloride (but not sodium) in pulp and skin of grape berries and in resultant wines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride-excluding rootstocks did not reduce sodium in berries and wine.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
Chloride-excluding rootstockse0
Outcome
sodiume0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Chloride-excluding rootstocks demonstrated advantages through reduced chloride (but not sodium) in pulp and skin of grape berries and in resultant wines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1472 · show in text ↑

grafting · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

grafting · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.