Paper · 2006 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Identification of differentially expressed genes in Malus domestica after application of the non-pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Bk3 to the phyllosphere

S. Kurkcuoglu; J. Degenhardt; J. Lensing; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
49
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biological control of plant diseases by the application of antagonistic micro-organisms to the plant phyllosphere is only marginally understood. Suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) was used for the identification of genes expressed after application of the non-pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Bk3 to the phyllosphere of the apple scab-susceptible cultivar Malus domestica cv. Holsteiner Cox. In total, 157 expressed sequence tag (EST) clones were obtained. The sequencing of 113 ESTs which have a significantly elevated transcript level and the comparison of the obtained sequences with databases revealed similarities to different classes of pathogenesis-related proteins, for example, RNase-like PR10 protein and endochitinase, or similarities to proteins expressed under stress conditions that could have a protective function, for example, a germin-like protein, glutathione S-transferase, thioredoxin-like proteins, and heat shock proteins. In addition, several transcripts were identified that code for proteins which have a crucial role at different stages of pathogen recognition and in signalling pathways or an as yet unknown function in plant defence. The results show that a number of transcripts encoding proteins/enzymes which are known to be up-regulated after pathogen infection are also up-regulated after the application of a non-pathogenic bacterium to a M. domestica cultivar. The expression of these proteins might increase the plant resistance towards pathogen infection and damage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The analysis obtained 157 expressed sequence tag clones.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticat0
Outcome
expressed sequence tag (EST) clonese0
Value
157e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In total, 157 expressed sequence tag (EST) clones were obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequencing 113 elevated transcripts identified similarities to pathogenesis-related and stress-associated proteins.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticat0
Gene
RNase-like PR10 protein and endochitinasee0
Outcome
similarities to different classes of pathogenesis-related proteinse0
Value
113 ESTse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sequencing of 113 ESTs which have a significantly elevated transcript level and the comparison of the obtained sequences with databases revealed similarities to different classes of pathogenesis-related proteins, for example, RNase-like PR10 protein and endochitinase, or similarities to proteins expressed under stress conditions that could have a protective function, for example, a germin-like protein, glutathione S-transferase, thioredoxin-like proteins, and heat shock proteins.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several identified transcripts encode proteins involved in pathogen recognition and signalling, or with unknown plant defence function.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticat0
Outcome
transcripts were identified that code for proteinse0
Qualifier
pathogen recognition and in signalling pathways or an as yet unknown function in plant defencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several transcripts were identified that code for proteins which have a crucial role at different stages of pathogen recognition and in signalling pathways or an as yet unknown function in plant defence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying Pseudomonas fluorescens Bk3 up-regulated apple transcripts also known to be induced after pathogen infection.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae1
Material
Malus domestica cv. Holsteiner Coxe1
Treatment
application of the non-pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Bk3e1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens Bk3Pseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
transcripts encoding proteins/enzymese0
Direction
up-regulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a number of transcripts encoding proteins/enzymes which are known to be up-regulated after pathogen infection are also up-regulated after the application of a non-pathogenic bacterium to a M. domestica cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1417 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of the non-pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Bk3 to the phyllosphere of the apple scab-susceptible cultivar Malus domestica cv. Holsteiner Cox.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–412 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that expression of these proteins might increase apple resistance to pathogen damage.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticat0
Outcome
plant resistance towards pathogen infection and damagee0
Qualifier
expression of these proteinse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of these proteins might increase the plant resistance towards pathogen infection and damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Malus domestica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–67 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · molecular: expression · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.