Paper · 1993 · Annals of Applied Biology

Physiological and developmental aspects of increased plant growth in solarised soils

J. M. GRUENZWEIG; H. D. RABINOWITCH; J. KATAN

13
claims
16
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Soil solarisation enhances plant growth even in the absence of known major pathogens. This phenomenon is known as increased growth response (IGR). Corn, cucumber, sorghum, tobacco and tomato plants under controlled conditions revealed distinct IGR in solarised soil as compared to control non‐treated soil. IGR was recorded in shoots of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Rehovot 13) seedlings, 15 days after transplanting and in roots only two weeks later. Detailed studies on the third true tomato leaf showed significantly higher levels of chlorophyll and protein contents in plants from solarised soil as compared to those from the control. In addition, the degradation of these compounds, decrease of net photosynthesis at near‐saturation light intensity and of photochemical yield with ageing were delayed in plants growing in solarised soil as compared to the control. The ratio of variable to maximal chlorophyll fluorescence was independent of soil treatment and was comparable to normal levels measured in other plants. Therefore, no apparent environmental stress seems to be involved in either of the soil‐plant systems. It is concluded that the initial IGR in solarised soil is independent of improved root growth. Delayed leaf senescence appeared to be a plant response contributing to IGR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn showed increased growth response in solarised soil relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
solarised soile0
Outcome
IGRe0
Direction
distinct IGRe0
Comparator
control non‐treated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn, cucumber, sorghum, tobacco and tomato plants under controlled conditions revealed distinct IGR in solarised soil as compared to control non‐treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber showed increased growth response in solarised soil relative to untreated soil.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
solarised soile0
Outcome
IGRe0
Direction
distinct IGRe0
Comparator
control non‐treated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn, cucumber, sorghum, tobacco and tomato plants under controlled conditions revealed distinct IGR in solarised soil as compared to control non‐treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum showed increased growth response in solarised soil relative to untreated soil.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
solarised soile0
Outcome
IGRe0
Direction
distinct IGRe0
Comparator
control non‐treated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn, cucumber, sorghum, tobacco and tomato plants under controlled conditions revealed distinct IGR in solarised soil as compared to control non‐treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco showed increased growth response in solarised soil relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
solarised soile0
Outcome
IGRe0
Direction
distinct IGRe0
Comparator
control non‐treated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn, cucumber, sorghum, tobacco and tomato plants under controlled conditions revealed distinct IGR in solarised soil as compared to control non‐treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato showed increased growth response in solarised soil relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
solarised soile0
Outcome
IGRe0
Direction
distinct IGRe0
Comparator
control non‐treated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn, cucumber, sorghum, tobacco and tomato plants under controlled conditions revealed distinct IGR in solarised soil as compared to control non‐treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–313 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In tomato seedlings, increased growth response occurred in shoots 15 days after transplanting and in roots two weeks later.

Material
cv. Rehovot 13e1
Organ / stage
seedlingse1
Outcome
IGR was recorded in shootse1
Qualifier
in roots only two weeks latere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“IGR was recorded in shoots of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Rehovot 13) seedlings, 15 days after transplanting and in roots only two weeks later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The third true tomato leaf had significantly higher chlorophyll and protein contents after soil solarisation than in controls.

Organ / stage
third true tomato leafe2
Treatment
solarised soile2
Outcome
chlorophyll and protein contentse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Detailed studies on the third true tomato leaf showed significantly higher levels of chlorophyll and protein contents in plants from solarised soil as compared to those from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Degradation of chlorophyll and protein was delayed with leaf aging in plants grown in solarised soil relative to controls.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee3
Treatment
solarised soile3
Outcome
degradation of these compoundse3
Direction
delayede3
Qualifier
with ageinge3
Comparator
the controle3

Verbatim

e3

“the degradation of these compounds, decrease of net photosynthesis at near‐saturation light intensity and of photochemical yield with ageing were delayed in plants growing in solarised soil as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–890 · show in text ↑
e2

“chlorophyll and protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The age-related decrease of net photosynthesis was delayed in solarised soil relative to control soil.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee3
Treatment
solarised soile3
Outcome
net photosynthesise3
Direction
delayede3
Qualifier
at near‐saturation light intensitye3
Comparator
the controle3

Verbatim

e3

“decrease of net photosynthesis at near‐saturation light intensity and of photochemical yield with ageing were delayed in plants growing in solarised soil as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The age-related decline of photochemical yield was delayed in solarised soil relative to control soil.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee3
Treatment
solarised soile3
Outcome
photochemical yielde3
Direction
delayede3
Qualifier
with ageinge3
Comparator
the controle3

Verbatim

e3

“decrease of net photosynthesis at near‐saturation light intensity and of photochemical yield with ageing were delayed in plants growing in solarised soil as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ratio of variable to maximal chlorophyll fluorescence was independent of soil treatment and comparable to normal plant levels.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee4
Treatment
soil treatmente4
Outcome
ratio of variable to maximal chlorophyll fluorescencee4
Direction
independente4
Comparator
normal levels measured in other plantse4

Verbatim

e4

“The ratio of variable to maximal chlorophyll fluorescence was independent of soil treatment and was comparable to normal levels measured in other plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1044 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that initial increased growth response in solarised soil is independent of improved root growth.

Treatment
solarised soile5
Outcome
initial IGRe5
Direction
independente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“It is concluded that the initial IGR in solarised soil is independent of improved root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1241 · show in text ↑
e0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–205 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted delayed leaf senescence as contributing to increased growth response.

Outcome
IGRe6
Qualifier
Delayed leaf senescencee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Delayed leaf senescence appeared to be a plant response contributing to IGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1318 · show in text ↑
e0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–205 · show in text ↑

solarization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

solarization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

solarization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

solarization · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

solarization · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.