Paper · 2013 · Journal of Medicinal Plants Research

Effects of non-chemical and chemical fertilizers on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield and quality

Gholam Reza Mohammadi; Abasalt Rostami Ajirloo; Mohammad-Eghbal Ghobadi; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of natural and chemical fertilizers on yield and quality of potato, a study was conducted at the Agricultural Research Farm of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. The experiment was a factorial with three factors arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The first factor was tuber inoculation with Nitragin biofertilizer (a combination of Azotobacter species and Azospirillumspecies) at two levels: non inoculated and inoculated. The second factor was HB-101 (a completely organic natural extract) with three levels: non sprayed, one time and two times sprayed onto the potato foliage during the growing season. The third factor was chemical urea fertilizer with two levels: non-used (0) and used at rate of 500 kg/ha. The results showed that the factors had significant effects on tuber yield, tuber weight, the number of tuber per plant, biological yield, harvest index, and tuber nitrate content of potato. The highest tuber yield and the number of tuber per plant were obtained when the tubers were inoculated with Nitragin; urea was used and HB-101 was sprayed two times. Moreover, the lowest tuber nitrate content was obtained when HB-101 was sprayed two times and the tubers were inoculated with Nitragin biofertilizer. It is concluded that integrated application of natural and biological fertilizers along with urea can be useful to enhance potato yield and quality. Key words: Biofertilizer, HB-101, Nitragin, potato, quality, yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer factors significantly affected tuber yield, tuber weight and number of tubers per plant.

Treatment
Nitragin biofertilizere1
Outcome
tuber yield, tuber weight, the number of tuber per plante0
Comparator
non inoculatede2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the factors had significant effects on tuber yield, tuber weight, the number of tuber per plant, biological yield, harvest index, and tuber nitrate content of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“tuber inoculation with Nitragin biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–385 · show in text ↑
e2

“non inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer factors significantly affected biological yield, harvest index and tuber nitrate content.

Treatment
HB-101e1
Outcome
biological yield, harvest index, and tuber nitrate contente0
Comparator
non sprayede2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the factors had significant effects on tuber yield, tuber weight, the number of tuber per plant, biological yield, harvest index, and tuber nitrate content of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“The second factor was HB-101”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–523 · show in text ↑
e2

“non sprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitragin inoculation, urea and two HB-101 sprays gave the highest tuber yield.

Taxon
tuberse0
Treatment
inoculated with Nitragin; urea was used and HB-101 was sprayed two timese0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
non inoculatede1

Verbatim

e0

“The highest tuber yield and the number of tuber per plant were obtained when the tubers were inoculated with Nitragin; urea was used and HB-101 was sprayed two times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“non inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitragin inoculation, urea and two HB-101 sprays gave the most tubers per plant.

Taxon
tuberse0
Treatment
inoculated with Nitragin; urea was used and HB-101 was sprayed two timese0
Outcome
number of tuber per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
non inoculatede1

Verbatim

e0

“The highest tuber yield and the number of tuber per plant were obtained when the tubers were inoculated with Nitragin; urea was used and HB-101 was sprayed two times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“non inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two HB-101 sprays with Nitragin inoculation gave the lowest tuber nitrate content.

Taxon
tuberse0
Treatment
HB-101 was sprayed two times and the tubers were inoculated with Nitragin biofertilizere0
Outcome
tuber nitrate contente0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
non sprayede1

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest tuber nitrate content was obtained when HB-101 was sprayed two times and the tubers were inoculated with Nitragin biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1290 · show in text ↑
e1

“non sprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–593 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that integrated natural, biological and urea fertilizers can enhance potato yield and quality.

Outcome
potato yield and qualitye0
Direction
enhancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated application of natural and biological fertilizers along with urea can be useful to enhance potato yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1439 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 80 positive, 13 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

46 papers: 46 positive, 0 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.