Paper · 2015 · CLEAN - Soil Air Water

Salinity Tolerance in Wheat Cultivars Is Related to Enhanced Activities of Enzymatic Antioxidants and Reduced Lipid Peroxidation

Abdul Khaliq; Muhammad Zia‐ul‐Haq; Faizan Ali; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Soil salinity is a stringent abiotic constraint limiting crop productivity. Studies were undertaken to appraise the performance of six diverse wheat cultivars (LU‐26S, MH‐97, AARI‐2011, Millat‐2011, Lasani‐2008, and FSD‐2008) under non‐saline (control) and saline soil (8 and 16 dS m −1 ) conditions. Increasing the salinity level severely diminished emergence and seedling growth attributes in all wheat cultivars. Nevertheless, cultivar specific responses were evident and a significant salinity × cultivar was observed in most cases. The lowest (23%) reduction in final emergence was observed for AARI‐2011 as compared with the maximum recorded for LU‐26S (56%). AARI‐2011 and Millat‐2011 recorded the highest seedling dry biomass at a salinity level of 16 dS m −1 . The highest salinity level resulted in the maximum inhibition of chlorophyll content in Millat‐2011 and MH‐97 by 59 and 68%, respectively, as compared with their respective control. With an increase in the salinity level, enhanced activities of antioxidants like superoxide dismutase and catalase were observed in AARI‐2011 compared with all other wheat cultivars. Lasani‐2008 showed a maximum (70%) increase in malondialdehyde content compared with control. AARI‐2011 and FSD‐2008 appeared as promising wheat cultivars manifesting salt tolerance that was related to enhanced activities of enzymatic antioxidants and reduced lipid peroxidation, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced emergence and seedling growth attributes in all wheat cultivars.

Treatment
Increasing the salinity levele0
Outcome
emergence and seedling growth attributese0
Direction
diminishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the salinity level severely diminished emergence and seedling growth attributes in all wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–415 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars showed distinct salinity responses, with a significant salinity-by-cultivar interaction in most cases.

Material
cultivare0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
cultivar specific responsese0
Qualifier
in most casese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nevertheless, cultivar specific responses were evident and a significant salinity × cultivar was observed in most cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AARI‐2011 had the lowest reduction in final emergence, 23%.

Material
AARI‐2011e0
Outcome
final emergencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
LU‐26Se0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest (23%) reduction in final emergence was observed for AARI‐2011 as compared with the maximum recorded for LU‐26S (56%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LU‐26S had the greatest reduction in final emergence, 56%.

Material
LU‐26Se0
Outcome
final emergencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
56%e0
Comparator
AARI‐2011e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest (23%) reduction in final emergence was observed for AARI‐2011 as compared with the maximum recorded for LU‐26S (56%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AARI‐2011 had among the highest seedling dry biomass at 16 dS m −1 salinity.

Material
AARI‐2011e0
Treatment
16 dS m −1e0
Outcome
seedling dry biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AARI‐2011 and Millat‐2011 recorded the highest seedling dry biomass at a salinity level of 16 dS m −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Millat‐2011 had among the highest seedling dry biomass at 16 dS m −1 salinity.

Material
Millat‐2011e0
Treatment
16 dS m −1e0
Outcome
seedling dry biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AARI‐2011 and Millat‐2011 recorded the highest seedling dry biomass at a salinity level of 16 dS m −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest salinity, Millat‐2011 chlorophyll content fell by 59% relative to control.

Material
Millat‐2011e0
Treatment
highest salinity levele0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
59e0
Comparator
respective controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest salinity level resulted in the maximum inhibition of chlorophyll content in Millat‐2011 and MH‐97 by 59 and 68%, respectively, as compared with their respective control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest salinity, MH‐97 chlorophyll content fell by 68% relative to control.

Material
MH‐97e0
Treatment
highest salinity levele0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
68%e0
Comparator
respective controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest salinity level resulted in the maximum inhibition of chlorophyll content in Millat‐2011 and MH‐97 by 59 and 68%, respectively, as compared with their respective control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With increasing salinity, AARI‐2011 showed greater superoxide dismutase and catalase activities than other cultivars.

Material
AARI‐2011e0
Treatment
salinity levele0
Outcome
activities of antioxidants like superoxide dismutase and catalasee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
all other wheat cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With an increase in the salinity level, enhanced activities of antioxidants like superoxide dismutase and catalase were observed in AARI‐2011 compared with all other wheat cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lasani‐2008 showed a maximum 70% increase in malondialdehyde content relative to control.

Material
Lasani‐2008e0
Outcome
malondialdehyde contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lasani‐2008 showed a maximum (70%) increase in malondialdehyde content compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AARI‐2011 was identified as promising for salt tolerance associated with enhanced enzymatic antioxidant activity.

Material
AARI‐2011e0
Outcome
salt tolerancee0
Qualifier
enhanced activities of enzymatic antioxidantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AARI‐2011 and FSD‐2008 appeared as promising wheat cultivars manifesting salt tolerance that was related to enhanced activities of enzymatic antioxidants and reduced lipid peroxidation, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1428 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FSD‐2008 was identified as promising for salt tolerance associated with reduced lipid peroxidation.

Material
FSD‐2008e0
Outcome
salt tolerancee0
Qualifier
reduced lipid peroxidatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AARI‐2011 and FSD‐2008 appeared as promising wheat cultivars manifesting salt tolerance that was related to enhanced activities of enzymatic antioxidants and reduced lipid peroxidation, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1428 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 9 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.