Paper · 2005 · Weed Technology

Cotton Response to CGA-362622 Applied Alone and in Combination with Selected Insecticides

Brad W. Minton; Scott A. Senseman; J. Tom Cothren; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

CGA-362622 has been registered for postemergence (POST) over-the-top or POST-directed application in cotton. Research was conducted during 1998 in Texas to determine potential cotton phytotoxicity after POST application of CGA-362622 alone and with the insecticides acephate, dicrotophos, azinphos methyl, oxamyl, thiamethoxam, dimethoate, and malathion and to determine the response of four cotton cultivars to CGA-362622 applied alone. CGA-362622 applied with malathion injured cotton more than either pesticide applied alone, and yield was reduced in one of four locations when the pesticides were applied in mixture compared with nontreated cotton. Pyrithiobac or CGA-362622 mixed with malathion injured cotton similarly. The other insecticides tank mixed with CGA-362622 generally did not adversely affect cotton. The cotton cultivars ‘Delta and Pine Land 50’, ‘Paymaster 1220’, ‘Paymaster 1220RR’, and ‘Stoneville 474’ responded similarly to CGA-362622 applied alone or with insecticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA-362622 with malathion injured cotton more than either pesticide alone.

Treatment
CGA-362622 applied with malathione0
Outcome
injured cottone0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
either pesticide applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CGA-362622 applied with malathion injured cotton more than either pesticide applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CGA-362622 and malathion mixture reduced cotton yield at one of four locations relative to nontreated cotton.

Treatment
pesticides were applied in mixturee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
one of four locationse0
Comparator
nontreated cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield was reduced in one of four locations when the pesticides were applied in mixture compared with nontreated cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrithiobac and CGA-362622 mixtures with malathion caused similar cotton injury.

Treatment
Pyrithiobac or CGA-362622 mixed with malathione0
Outcome
injured cottone0
Direction
similarlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyrithiobac or CGA-362622 mixed with malathion injured cotton similarly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other insecticides mixed with CGA-362622 generally did not adversely affect cotton.

Treatment
other insecticides tank mixed with CGA-362622e0
Outcome
cottone0
Direction
did not adversely affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The other insecticides tank mixed with CGA-362622 generally did not adversely affect cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–817 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four named cotton cultivars responded similarly to CGA-362622 alone or with insecticides.

Material
cotton cultivarse0
Treatment
CGA-362622 applied alone or with insecticidese0
Outcome
responded similarlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton cultivars ‘Delta and Pine Land 50’, ‘Paymaster 1220’, ‘Paymaster 1220RR’, and ‘Stoneville 474’ responded similarly to CGA-362622 applied alone or with insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–993 · show in text ↑

malathion · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 59 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Combined applications increased for yield

    Influence of Flower Thrips on Fusarium Hardlock Severity · 2007 · compared with using insecticides alone

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

insecticide · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.