Paper · 1954 · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)

Effects of Calcium Sulfamate and Sodium Sulfanilate on Certain Agronomic Characteristics and on Rust Development of Spring Wheat and Barley and Oats

Aristeo Acosta Carreón

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The object of this study was to determine the effects of calcium sulfamate and sodium sulfanilate on certain agronomic characteristics and on rust development on spring wheat, barley, and oat varieties. Four spring wheat varieties, Centenario, Mida, Rushmore, and Nugget were planted in a split plot design with varieties as the main plots. Two spring barley varieties, Feebar and Custer, and two oat varieties, Nemaha and Kanota were planted in a separate experiment in a split-split-plot design, with crops as the main plots and varieties as the subplots. In both experiments the treatments consisted of aqueous solutions made with calcium sulfamate and sodium sulfanilate at two concentrations which were applied immediately after pollination, and 4 to 7 days later a second application was made to half of the previously treated plants. High doses of calcium sulfamate injured the plants by reducing yield, germination, kernel weight, and total weight of the plant (straw and grain). This injury was the most severe on the wheat and oats. The germination of wheat was reduced slightly more than 50 percent, oats by 62 percent, and barleys by 14 percent. The high doses of calcium sulfamate reduced rust infection in all three crops. Sodium sulfanilate increased the yields and kernel weights in all three crops and the germination of seed was not affected. This chemical gave no control of rust except in the case of Custer barley. Another experiment was planted with Mida spring wheat and treated at six stages of growth with aqueous solutions of calcium sulfamate and sodium sulfanilate. The stage of growth at which the chemicals must be applied appeared to play an important role in their use. Calcium sulfamate injured the plants when applied at tillering stage, immediately after bloom, and seven or nine days after bloom. When this chemical was applied at bloom and boot stages no injury was apparent, and the yields were higher than that for the check. Sodium sulfanilate did not injure the plants at any stage or give any rust control. On the other hand the yields and kernel weights were increased considerably when this chemical was applied at one week after bloom which suggests that this chemical although it does not control rust has some stimulative effect. Advisors: L. P. Reitz and J. E. Livingston

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High calcium sulfamate doses reduced wheat yield, germination, kernel weight and plant weight.

Treatment
High doses of calcium sulfamatee0
Outcome
yield, germination, kernel weight, and total weight of the plante0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High doses of calcium sulfamate injured the plants by reducing yield, germination, kernel weight, and total weight of the plant (straw and grain). This injury was the most severe on the wheat and oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High calcium sulfamate doses injured oats especially severely.

Outcome
injurye0
Direction
most severee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This injury was the most severe on the wheat and oats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat germination fell slightly more than 50 percent.

Outcome
germination of wheate0
Direction
reducede0
Value
slightly more than 50 percente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination of wheat was reduced slightly more than 50 percent, oats by 62 percent, and barleys by 14 percent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat germination fell by 62 percent.

Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
62 percente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination of wheat was reduced slightly more than 50 percent, oats by 62 percent, and barleys by 14 percent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley germination fell by 14 percent.

Taxon
barleysHordeume0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14 percente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum
Hordeum · TaxonMatt Lavin · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination of wheat was reduced slightly more than 50 percent, oats by 62 percent, and barleys by 14 percent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High calcium sulfamate doses reduced rust infection in wheat, barley and oats.

Taxon
Spring Wheat and Barley and OatsAvena sativaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high doses of calcium sulfamatee0
Outcome
rust infectione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high doses of calcium sulfamate reduced rust infection in all three crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat and Barley and Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium sulfanilate increased yields and kernel weights in all three crops.

Taxon
Spring Wheat and Barley and OatsAvena sativaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Sodium sulfanilatee0
Outcome
yields and kernel weightse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium sulfanilate increased the yields and kernel weights in all three crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat and Barley and Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium sulfanilate did not affect seed germination.

Taxon
Spring Wheat and Barley and OatsAvena sativaHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Sodium sulfanilatee0
Outcome
germination of seede0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium sulfanilate increased the yields and kernel weights in all three crops and the germination of seed was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat and Barley and Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium sulfanilate controlled rust only in Custer barley.

Material
Custere0
Treatment
This chemicale0
Outcome
control of ruste0
Direction
no controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This chemical gave no control of rust except in the case of Custer barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium sulfamate injured Mida wheat at tillering, immediately after bloom, and seven or nine days after bloom.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Calcium sulfamatee0
Outcome
injured the plantse0
Direction
injurede0
Qualifier
tillering stage, immediately after bloom, and seven or nine days after bloome0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium sulfamate injured the plants when applied at tillering stage, immediately after bloom, and seven or nine days after bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium sulfamate at bloom and boot caused no apparent injury and yields exceeded the check.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
this chemicale0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
bloom and boot stagese0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When this chemical was applied at bloom and boot stages no injury was apparent, and the yields were higher than that for the check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–1964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium sulfanilate did not injure Mida wheat at any stage or control rust.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Sodium sulfanilatee0
Outcome
rust controle0
Direction
did note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium sulfanilate did not injure the plants at any stage or give any rust control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium sulfanilate one week after bloom considerably increased yields and kernel weights.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
this chemicale0
Outcome
yields and kernel weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
one week after bloome0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yields and kernel weights were increased considerably when this chemical was applied at one week after bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2067–2179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

calcium atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sodium atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sodium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

sodium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 9 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

sodium atom · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.