Paper · 1993 · HortTechnology

Comparison of NAA and Carbaryl Petal-fall Sprays on Fruit Set of Apples

Max W. Williams

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Biennial bearing of apple trees can be overcome either by the use of a blossom chemical thinner or by early application of a postbloom thinner. Carbaryl (Sevin) is a post-bloom fruit-thinning chemical with an effective thinning period of 4 to 5 weeks after bloom. Sevin was compared in 1992 and 1993 with NAA as an early petal-fall spray. Sevin treatments reduced fruit set to one fruit per cluster with no adverse side effects on the foliage. NAA inconsistently reduced fruit set and the remaining fruit were in clusters, The NAA-treated foliage was adversely affected; having small curled leaves. NAA at 10 ppm under-thinned in 1992 and seriously over-thinned in 1993, whereas Sevin treatments were consistent for fruit thinning in both years. Sevin applied at petal-fall or at petal-fall + 7 days effectively reduced fruit set and reduced fruit competition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin reduced apple fruit set to one fruit per cluster.

Treatment
Sevin treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0
Value
one fruit per clustere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sevin treatments reduced fruit set to one fruit per cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin had no adverse effects on apple foliage.

Treatment
Sevin treatmentse0
Outcome
adverse side effects on the foliagee0
Direction
no adversee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sevin treatments reduced fruit set to one fruit per cluster with no adverse side effects on the foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA inconsistently reduced apple fruit set, leaving fruit in clusters.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
inconsistently reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA inconsistently reduced fruit set and the remaining fruit were in clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA adversely affected foliage, producing small curled leaves.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
small curled leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NAA-treated foliage was adversely affected; having small curled leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 10 ppm under-thinned apple fruit in 1992.

Treatment
NAA at 10 ppme0
Outcome
under-thinnede0
Direction
under-thinnede0
Setting
1992e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA at 10 ppm under-thinned in 1992”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 10 ppm seriously over-thinned apple fruit in 1993.

Treatment
NAA at 10 ppme0
Outcome
seriously over-thinnede0
Direction
over-thinnede0
Setting
1993e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA at 10 ppm under-thinned in 1992 and seriously over-thinned in 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin consistently thinned fruit in both years.

Treatment
Sevin treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit thinninge0
Direction
consistente0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sevin treatments were consistent for fruit thinning in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin at petal fall or seven days later reduced fruit set.

Treatment
Sevin applied at petal-fall or at petal-fall + 7 dayse0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sevin applied at petal-fall or at petal-fall + 7 days effectively reduced fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin at petal fall or seven days later reduced fruit competition.

Treatment
Sevin applied at petal-fall or at petal-fall + 7 dayse0
Outcome
fruit competitione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sevin applied at petal-fall or at petal-fall + 7 days effectively reduced fruit set and reduced fruit competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑

carbaryl · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

42 papers: 32 positive, 10 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.