Paper · 1970 · HortScience

Effects of Gibberellic Acid and Nitrogen on the Strawberry cv. ‘Redcoat’1

C. R. Blatt; D. N. A. Crouse

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Field grown plants receiving gibberellic acid (GA) 4 weeks or 4 and 8 weeks after planting produced significantly more runners than the control. Compared with the controls, there were no significant vegetative or cropping differences due to rate of GA application. Increasing the rate of applied nitrogen increased runner, runner plant, and % leaf N values in greenhouse grown plants and a GA spray of 50 ppm combined with 120 ppm N gave the highest runner plant yield. Time of GA application was the significant factor in the vegetative response of this cultivar; however, compared with the control the increases were relatively small.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA applied four weeks or four and eight weeks after planting significantly increased field runner production.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
gibberellic acid (GA) 4 weeks or 4 and 8 weeks after plantinge0
Outcome
runnerse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
Field growne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field grown plants receiving gibberellic acid (GA) 4 weeks or 4 and 8 weeks after planting produced significantly more runners than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA application rate did not yield significant vegetative or cropping differences against controls.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
rate of GA applicatione0
Outcome
vegetative or cropping differencese0
Direction
no significante0
Comparator
the controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the controls, there were no significant vegetative or cropping differences due to rate of GA application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher applied nitrogen increased runners in greenhouse plants.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Increasing the rate of applied nitrogene0
Outcome
runnere0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the rate of applied nitrogen increased runner, runner plant, and % leaf N values in greenhouse grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher applied nitrogen increased runner plants in greenhouse plants.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Increasing the rate of applied nitrogene0
Outcome
runner plante0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the rate of applied nitrogen increased runner, runner plant, and % leaf N values in greenhouse grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher applied nitrogen increased leaf nitrogen percentage in greenhouse plants.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Increasing the rate of applied nitrogene0
Outcome
% leaf N valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the rate of applied nitrogen increased runner, runner plant, and % leaf N values in greenhouse grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50 ppm GA spray with 120 ppm N yielded the most runner plants.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
a GA spray of 50 ppm combined with 120 ppm Ne0
Outcome
runner plant yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a GA spray of 50 ppm combined with 120 ppm N gave the highest runner plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA application timing significantly influenced vegetative response, although increases over controls were small.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Time of GA applicatione0
Outcome
vegetative responsee0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
relatively smalle0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Time of GA application was the significant factor in the vegetative response of this cultivar; however, compared with the control the increases were relatively small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–58 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 58 positive, 11 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.