Paper · 2014

Using Safe Alternatives for Controlling Postharvest Decay, Maintaining Quality of Crimson Seedless Grape

Wafaa A. Abd Elwahab; Sahar M. Abd Elwahab; Omar T. Kamel

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This investigation was carried out in order to study the influence of postharvest application by immersion in 1% chitosan, 0.2% bergamot oil, 4% calcium chloride, 30% ethanol, 0.2% acetic acid and combination of 1 % chitosan + 4% calcium chloride, as alterative toSO compared with control (un treated) and 2 to reduce the decay and maintain quality attributes of Crimson seedless grape. The treated clusters stored up to 6weeks at 0°C and relative humidity (RH) 90-95% to evaluate quality attributes (decay %, loss in weight %, shattering %, firmness, berry adherence, total acidity%, total soluble solids%, vitamin c, content of anthocyanin and respiration rate of the clusters during storage periods. Results showed that decay, vitamin C loss and weight loss, shattering, TSS, anthocyanin content and respiration rate were increased with increasing storage period. Whereas acidity, firmness and berry adherence decreased by increasing storage period. All treatments decreased the decay compared with SO or control. 1% chitosan + 4% calcium chloride treatment decreased 2 weight loss, shattering percentage and delayed the changes in firmness, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, vitamin C, anthocyanin content and respiration rate during storage periods compared with control. Clusters treated with ethanol and acetic acid showed decrease in decay and shattering percentage without affect negatively on the quality attributes compared with control treatment. The study suggests that these treatments might be a promising candidate as an alternative to SO to control the decay, maintain grape quality and 2 also to get a safe and healthy product, especially during cold storage and long transport, thus extending post- harvest life of grape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decay, vitamin C loss, weight loss, shattering, TSS, anthocyanin content and respiration increased with storage period.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
decay, vitamin C loss and weight losse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
increasing storage periode0

Not reportedOrgan / stageSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that decay, vitamin C loss and weight loss, shattering, TSS, anthocyanin content and respiration rate were increased with increasing storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crimson Seedless Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidity, firmness and berry adherence declined with storage period.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
berrye0
Outcome
acidity, firmness and berry adherencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
increasing storage periode0

Verbatim

e0

“Whereas acidity, firmness and berry adherence decreased by increasing storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crimson Seedless Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments reduced grape decay relative to SO or control.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
All treatmentse0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
SO or controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments decreased the decay compared with SO or control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crimson Seedless Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan plus calcium chloride reduced weight loss and shattering relative to control.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
1% chitosan + 4% calcium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
weight loss, shattering percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“1% chitosan + 4% calcium chloride treatment decreased 2 weight loss, shattering percentage and delayed the changes in firmness, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, vitamin C, anthocyanin content and respiration rate during storage periods compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crimson Seedless Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan plus calcium chloride delayed changes in grape quality traits relative to control.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
1% chitosan + 4% calcium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
changes in firmness, titratable acidity, total soluble solidse0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“1% chitosan + 4% calcium chloride treatment decreased 2 weight loss, shattering percentage and delayed the changes in firmness, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, vitamin C, anthocyanin content and respiration rate during storage periods compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crimson Seedless Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan plus calcium chloride delayed changes in vitamin C, anthocyanin content and respiration rate.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
1% chitosan + 4% calcium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
vitamin C, anthocyanin content and respiration ratee0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“1% chitosan + 4% calcium chloride treatment decreased 2 weight loss, shattering percentage and delayed the changes in firmness, titratable acidity, total soluble solids, vitamin C, anthocyanin content and respiration rate during storage periods compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crimson Seedless Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol reduced grape decay and shattering without adverse quality effects relative to control.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
ethanole0
Outcome
decay and shattering percentagee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Clusters treated with ethanol and acetic acid showed decrease in decay and shattering percentage without affect negatively on the quality attributes compared with control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crimson Seedless Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetic acid reduced grape decay and shattering without adverse quality effects relative to control.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
acetic acide0
Outcome
decay and shattering percentagee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Clusters treated with ethanol and acetic acid showed decrease in decay and shattering percentage without affect negatively on the quality attributes compared with control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crimson Seedless Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest these treatments as alternatives to SO for grape decay control and quality maintenance.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
alternative to SO to control the decay, maintain grape qualitye0
Qualifier
especially during cold storage and long transporte0

Verbatim

e0

“The study suggests that these treatments might be a promising candidate as an alternative to SO to control the decay, maintain grape quality and 2 also to get a safe and healthy product, especially during cold storage and long transport, thus extending post- harvest life of grape.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1748 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · VitisResults differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · physiology: respiration · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · physiology: respiration · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

acetic acid · disease · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

ethanol · disease · VitisResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.