calcium chloride dihydrate · Quality: postharvest · Vitis

Results differ6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ

10 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.

Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1

1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.

How these papers cite each other

2 citations between these papers: 1 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect20002005201020152020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 5

  1. Suitability of Antep Karası Grape Variety for Peeling and Canning (Turkish with English Abstract) · 1997

  2. Using Safe Alternatives for Controlling Postharvest Decay, Maintaining Quality of Crimson Seedless Grape · 2014

    cited by 1 paper here

  3. Effect of Gibberellic Acid, Cytofex, and Calcium Chloride as Pre-Harvest Applications on Storability of “Thompson Seedless” Grapes · 2015

    cites 1 paper here

  4. Effect of pre-harvest application of salicylic acid, potassium silicate, and calcium chloride, on storability and quality attributes of table grape · 2022

    cites 1 paper here

  5. Effect of calcium chloride on physical properties and shelf life of grapes (Vitis Vinifera) · 2024

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Effect of pre-harvest calcium chloride and ethanol spray on quality of 'El-Bayadi' table grapes during storage · 2015

    cited by 1 paper here

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

calcium chloride dihydrate on Vitis against other targets

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest on other organisms